D304 Cobb with back damage on ebay -- back damage not shown

[Matt]

Originally Posted by HRBAKER

Most likely an oversight at least not mentioning the back damage in the description. Also probably switched the Paige in the previous thread to BCCG because he liked the holder better.

Jeff - I've noticed a disturbing trend in your posts lately.

[barrysloate]

If I sell a $50 card I provide a scan of both the front and back. To not include a back scan on a 12.5K card (really a 6.5K card that magically doubled overnight), especially one with back damage, is clearly no accident.

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by Matt

Jeff - I've noticed a disturbing trend in your posts lately.

Matt,
Give me a couple of days. It's a particularly virulent strain of cynicism.

Jeff

[calvindog]

Guys, the seller just wrote to me that he really only wants about half of the $12,500 asking price and that I "must have been born yesterday" to think otherwise. So...he bought the card for the same price he wants to sell it for...and it's just a coincidence that he put it on ebay for double that price -- and without the back damage. Sounds like a great selling strategy. Here's another:

1. Collect underpants

2. .....

3. Profits

[Matt]

Originally Posted by calvindog

1. Collect underpants

2. .....

3. Profit

I recently worked for a company that used the South Park model of business for several years. They're currently in the process of going under.

[e107collector]

The same seller is also selling the 1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson SGC Auth for $20,000.

I believe that card sold for around $9,500 a few weeks ago in Heritage.

Tony