For Sale Artifically Aged Reprints $5.00 Makes Great Gifts See Pics

[sayhey24]

Originally Posted by rarerookies

Ok. So if you soak the card to enhance the appeal of the card doesn't sanding, re backing, trimming help enhance the card too?

So if soaking's ok then whats wrong with trimming or rebacking as long as the reback is an original card? Don't those enhance the appeal of the card too?

The word card doctors come to mind.

Card doctors is actually two words, not one.

The poster also needs to learn the difference between there and their, and slander and libel.

Greg

[rarerookies]

So basically you really have nothing of any substance to say about the topic besides grammar issues?

Originally Posted by sayhey24

Card doctors is actually two words, not one.

The poster also needs to learn the difference between there and their, and slander and libel.

Greg

[Vol]

.

[asphaltman]

I don't read stupid threads often. But when I do, I prefer to read about artificially aged reprints that will be sold at a later date on eBay to a clueless collector.

Stay thirsty my friends.

[53Browns]

Yeah, please peddle your junk elsewhere. This site is for collectors of authentic material.

[rarerookies]

I haven't posted anything else for sale on this site since I found out you guys weren't interested.

Originally Posted by 53Browns

Yeah, please peddle your junk elsewhere. This site is for collectors of authentic material.

[J.McMurry]

RR- I was just reminded of that because,..

If you're selling reprints,that is perfectly legal.

But if your selling reprints that have been "enhanced" to look real,then it's obvious that your target market will be mainly crooks who will try to resell the cards as real,which is Illegal.

I admit it's not a apples to apples comparison,but I said I was reminded of it,not that it was the same.

[Wite3]

I tried to educate...he is a troll.

You want a better comparison...

You take a known fake purse and remove the tags and add gucci symbol. You say you are just enhancing something to make it affordable to someone who can't own the real thing. You want it to look authentic. It is still a fake though and can still then be used for a fraudulent transaction.

OR...you take a real gucci bag, clean off the dirt and sew up the rip. It is still a real gucci bag and still retains its value as such.

Do you get it now?

[rarerookies]

I understand what you are saying but you are bashing me for something someone else might do. And not what I am doing. Just like if someone goes out and buys sudafed and makes meth out of it or someone buys a gun and murders someone.

Do you blame the gun or the drug manufacturer or do you blame the person who buys it?

Originally Posted by Wite3

I tried to educate...he is a troll.

You want a better comparison...

You take a known fake purse and remove the tags and add gucci symbol. You say you are just enhancing something to make it affordable to someone who can't own the real thing. You want it to look authentic. It is still a fake though and can still then be used for a fraudulent transaction.

OR...you take a real gucci bag, clean off the dirt and sew up the rip. It is still a real gucci bag and still retains its value as such.

Do you get it now?