Oh good, somebody altered my N172 (w/before and after photos)

birdman42 · #1 12-10-2010, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chaddurbin

that seems like alot of work to get a low value card from an A to a 10 holder (if more than swab of cotton and water is involved)...

Unless it's a "practice" card. Not much downside from the original if something went horribly wrong.

Feeling a little cynical this morning,

Bill

Abravefan11 · #2 12-10-2010, 08:01 AM

Anthony I found a scan of the card prior to being slabbed and paired it with yours. Hope this helps with your comparison.

Leon · #3 12-10-2010, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abravefan11

Anthony I found a scan of the card prior to being slabbed and paired it with yours. Hope this helps with your comparison.

Ok...we took a card that was $100 and made into a $125 card...Now we got something going. For the record, I would pay a few bucks more for the altered one, an an AUT holder, than the original unaltered one in a 1 holder. No need for me to comment on who did what and when. I have no idea.

I still feel the the percentage of cards messed with goes up with the numerical grade AND have always believed some (much) smaller percentage of lesser grade cards have been missed with too. Again, just my little ole opinion. regards

M's_Fan · #4 12-10-2010, 08:30 AM

How has the paper loss on the left been restored so perfectly, while the loss on the right is still visible? I agree with Rhett that the white spot on the left appears to have been paper stuck on that was soaked off.

Its also possible that this card doctor practiced on this low grade card to hone his skills for something of a higher grade.

Peter_Spaeth · #5 12-10-2010, 08:33 AM

Looks to me like something stuck to the card not paper loss. Also FWIW there are a couple of tiny white spots on the left that were removed, or soaked off, as well.

Abravefan11 · #6 12-10-2010, 08:43 AM

I agree with the others that it looks like something stuck to the card was removed to improve eye appeal as opposed to something being added. This coupled with the condition of the back of the card, it doesn't seem to me anything deceptive was done.

Peter_Spaeth · #7 12-10-2010, 08:52 AM

The two white spots at the top have a different shade to them. If it was paper loss wouldn't the color be uniform?

Zach Wheat · #8 12-10-2010, 09:38 AM

I agree with Peter...you would think the spots would have a different color to them. I will be very interested to see what you find when you examine closely. BOTN, don't take offense, I have worked with Kramer and I had to reread your statement to make certain what you meant. I am glad the second poster clarified.

MWheat

Anthony S. · #9 12-10-2010, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abravefan11

Anthony I found a scan of the card prior to being slabbed and paired it with yours. Hope this helps with your comparison.

Good job, Tim. Yes, the left area may well prove to be something that was simply stuck to the card and subsequently removed, as Rhett first suggested.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Wanting to Buy a N172 Old Judge Harry Wright and a N172 Cap Anson	Archive	19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T	4	06-03-2009 09:09 PM
Trade N172 Getzein Indianapolis for Detroit N172	Archive	19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T	1	11-25-2008 08:31 PM
PSA 6 N172 Old Judge Sutton, Phelan, Smith	Archive	19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T	2	10-13-2005 06:24 PM
N172 question	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	9	01-07-2004 05:22 PM
1888 Old Judge N172 Proof	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	3	03-06-2003 07:12 AM