|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			that's kind of disturbing.  good job by bill.  i was going to suggest getting a refund from the seller and let him deal with psa but bill's already taken care of the matter.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Hmmm..its hard to believe after all this time...you would think a light bulb will go off in the heads of the design team... typing this as I stare at a E90-1 floating sideways in my older PSA holder...   | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Remember this thread for the next time we see the question "Should I use PSA or SGC for grading?" Time for PSA to execute their damage control-business continuity plan.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 I may choose SGC for other reasons but I had an oversized 4 figure card delivered to me that had moved inside an SGC holder and caused corner damage Craig | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 I like SGC better than PSA, but Craig is 100% correct. This can happen to any grading company. I put more of the blame on the packing/shipping methods. I recently picked up a few common T3s and they were tossed, loosely, in a box with a few other things. After rattling around for a few days, this was the result: 
				__________________ Jim Van Brunt | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			You need to start a web site psasucks.com where everyone can post their crappy work product.
		 
				__________________ Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 12-15-2010 at 06:25 AM. | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			A facebook page is easier...
		 | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Jim VB, That sucks with your T3's. I like SGC but one thing I noticed is the gaskets they use are thin. Why don't they use a thicker gasket material? If a T3 can slide in between the gasket and the holder, there is obviously enough space to accomodate a thicker gasket. Another thing I noticed about the gaskets is that after they are cut, they are pretty rough on the inner portion. Not sure if this has ever damaged a card, but you would think some improvements could be made. You can actually see some of the chipped off border on the T3 Downey. Mike Last edited by docpatlv; 12-15-2010 at 08:10 AM. | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			A thicker gasket would be better for SGC.   Why would anyone put a photo in the PSA no-gasket holders? Same with PSA's card holders where the card is just floating around, its awful for the card and awful looking. | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			It's available which is surprising since most companies buy the *sucks name just to avoid others from getting it.
		 | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| T206 for Sale: Almost 50% of set, 220 cards | Julian Wells | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 08-01-2010 04:42 PM | 
| Selling my psa t206s | rfurnish | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 27 | 02-03-2010 09:14 PM | 
| Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2009 10:05 AM | 
| Vintage FOOTBALL for sale, plus a few non-sport and multi-sport cards | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 02-24-2008 01:33 PM | 
| 1909-1979 211 PSA graded cards for sale | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 9 | 12-02-2007 05:01 PM |