 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-17-2010, 12:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Well...I never thought about making a "mock-up" of the sequential photos and then taking a picture...I can see how that would not be an original. However, as stated, you can make a contact print possibly, or, there are many ways to block off portions of the paper to expose different photos and then develop the print. I'd say if the rule is a hard and fast one, then it's just wrong. If it's a guide line unless you can prove otherwise, then ok.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Type I versus Type II : I'm a little confused | baseballart | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 32 | 08-20-2010 10:58 PM |
| Anyone else collect original photos that were used to make cards? | thekingofclout | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-17-2010 02:49 PM |
| Baseball - Vintage Type I Press Photos - Greenberg, Grove + ends Tonight Oct. 21 Ebay | D. Bergin | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 10-21-2009 07:49 AM |
| Lot of 400 Vintage Hockey Photos | IronHorse2130 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 06-01-2009 09:49 AM |
| E107 - Type I vs. Type II | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 07-17-2005 12:17 AM |
Hybrid Mode
