|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I always loaded my 800 count boxed sets with some overproduced cards front and back to reduce the risk of corner dings. I may have to rethink my binder storage for a couple of sets after reading this thread.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have Topps Sets from 1974 to 2010 all in binders and 9 pocket pages. I cover the top of them so dust doesn't get in them. I just like to have easy access. I don't see the problem. My older sets isn't in high grade though, but even if they were, I think I would still store them the same way.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is another thread which addresses the "binders hurting cards" issue...
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=131484 Doug |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I use a combination of all the methods above. I prefer binders because of how easy they are to flip through, but agree that they can be risky. I use them for sets like my '80 Topps set. Great to look through and low risk on anything that gets damaged.
For higher end collections, I use the use the semi-rigid and vault box method that vintagetoppsguy described. I find myself moving that way more and more because of the combination between safety and ease of storage (binders take up more space if you insist on laying them flat which is the only way I'll do it). Here's a question for you VintageTopps (or anyone else) - do you use penny sleeves before you put them in the semi-rigid? I've had this discussion with a lot of people and can't get consensus. Most collectors I know use the smaller holders and no penny sleeve. While I like how that looks, I worry about the semi-rigid holders not being archival quality with no pvc/acid. I use the larger semi-rigids with a penny sleeve, which still fit in the large vault boxes. Anyone else use the penny sleeve first? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I enjoy being able to hold each card individually so the Card Savers are great. Plus, again, I have a small collection as compared to many on here. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Personally I don't use a penny sleeve before placing the card in a semi-rigid top loader. However, let's make sure we're talking about the same kind of top loader.
I use these Ultra Pro that come 200 per box: ![]() I do not use these top loaders that come 25 per pack: ![]() I've been using the first ones for well over 20 years and never had a problem (they were another company before Ultra Pro). I tried using a penny sleeve with these, but the penny sleeve wants to bind up as I'm trying to slide the card in, so I just don't use one. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guys - Does anyone have a preference using Ultra Pro semi rigid top loaders over the CSII semi rigid top loaders?
Thanks, Mark |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Same ones. That's why I went the larger Ultra Pro's. I had the same problem with the penny slips, that's why I went to the larger Ultra Pros (the "graded card submission" version). Penny slips fit in easier, but the larger semi-rigids take up more space and require bigger vault boxes. I've just never gotten a clear answer on whether or not they have acid or pvc in them. The slips definitely don't (or at least are marketed as such). But, as you've attested along with many others, lots of people have had their cards in them for decades with no problems.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT - 1951 Storage Question | canjond | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 10-30-2010 07:41 AM |
| OT - storage help for 50 count plastic card boxes | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 07-06-2008 09:46 PM |
| original hartland statue question? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 12-29-2007 06:55 PM |
| supply storage question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-29-2004 07:35 PM |
| Question about this Christy Mathewson item (scanned) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-20-2002 07:33 PM |