 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22
01-28-2011, 01:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I think if your position is that we should focus on the company/brand for whom the cards were produced, then you are likely to agree with Burdick and leave the system as is, possible warts and all.
If your position (like mine) is that the focus should be on the company that actually printed the cards, you come down on the side of lumping the various brands advertised thereon. As I said earlier, I do see a precedent for "lumping" - R73 Indian Gum. Non-sports guys must be able to cite other multi-year, multi-series sets printed by the same company that have one ACC #. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First Time Submission | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-06-2009 12:28 PM |
| O/T - best all time | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 01-06-2009 08:24 PM |
| *** Time to fire up the Network 54 Cabal again....d311s this time *** | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 12-01-2008 12:55 PM |
| My first time at the National | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-29-2008 03:15 PM |
| OT but it is time for the 134th Kentucky Derby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 100 | 05-17-2008 06:45 PM |
Threaded Mode