Christopher Morales Forensic Investigator

[mcgwirecom]

For a 6 pack he would sign anything!

[Dalkiel]

This guy was the witness for Roger Hooper's hearing seeking to appeal his felonies in Pennsylvania. Needless to say it was denied in record time.

[bh3443]

i just want to thank Chris (thetruthisouthere/tomtresh) for his help in IDing a forgery. Here's where forgeries belong once discovered!
This is photo #1. Click my name and look into the album as my called shot is hit into the ocean!
Have a great weekend my friends!
Bill

[Fuddjcal]

I find it an out and out "COMPLETE JOKE" that there are people tooting this idiots Moral ass's horn. Like I have said before, he is either a seasoned criminal or a complete numskull.

I will re-iterate in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS THAT THE ONLY 2 AUTHENTIC MICKEY MANTLE AUTOGRAPHS THAT I HAVE SEEN IN 7 YEARS ARE THE 2 HE PEELED THE STICKERS OFF OFF FOR THE JSA STING.

This man, and I use the word loosely, either needs to go directly to jail with-out passing go, or needs to update his exemplar files. I guess anyone can stand behind anyone, but it just shows you that there is always someone looking to take the asses point of view and that's what the creater of the "Morales is the best Authenticator in the world" website is doing. Those who started that website, will not have 1 once of credibility until they try to smash this clown down the way they have JSA & PSA. YES... a complete and utter joke indeed, but somehow, I'm not laughing.

[Big Dave]

Did a search on "Morales is the best Authenticator in the world" and seems there are fans on both sides of the fence.

[Mr. Zipper]

Originally Posted by Big Dave

Did a search on "Morales is the best Authenticator in the world" and seems there are fans on both sides of the fence.

I think you'll find his fans are many of the same folks who despise PSA and JSA because they are not "true experts."

[travrosty]

are psa and jsa true experts?

by asking this question does that mean i approve of morales?

where do i state that?

some people try to play the game that if someone is against psa or jsa, that they are somehow for morales. its like the question, "when did you stop beating your wife? psa and jsa, and morales are two different issues, two totally different paradigms, and to suggest that you have to be for one (psa, jsa), in order to be against the other (morales) is ridiculous, and if you are against one (psa,jsa) you have to be for another (morales) is equally ridiculous.

people judge authenticators psa, jsa, morales, each according to their own individual skill and track record.

its like the people who say if you are not for public dwi checkpoints, then you must be for drunk driving. how stupid of a statement is that?