![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() The only actual advertisements were run in Georgia newspapers. The Macon Telegraph ran small one line advertisements like the following beginning February 8th and ran off and on for a month. ![]() The only picture advertisement was run in the Augusta Chronicle for four consecutive weeks. Feb 20, 27, Mar 6, 13. ![]() Last edited by Abravefan11; 05-19-2011 at 02:15 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, Tim amazing info thanks for sharing.
Cheers, John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hey guys
![]() One more stab- all factory cut/issued in packs should be on the master list: brown lenox, lenox, drum , hindu , piedy's, piedy 42's sov(green and apple) , sweet cap, even brown lenox etc etc.... basically anything "inserted" into the accepted distribution methods, ie packs of pied, american beauty, etc. etc..... SOME ERROR BACKS were inserted into packs(4 back/2 back/sheet numbers/ miscuts) etc, just a printer not paying attention....but these are "anomalies" and should be catagorized in a special "subset" like Leon also resonated, but included as a subset of regular issued backs(cards that where actually inserted into packs and purchased)... another subset: any "pre-production cards" NOT OFFICIALLY INSERTED INTO PACKS...imo brown om were definitely NOT inserted into packs, nor were blank backs, yellow browns, red overprint bars, real proofs with cross hatches, Leons overprint back, anything that can be differentiated as "HAND CUT" were taken either pre/post production not officially issued... hence....a third "back subset" TY COBB- lets put this to rest......a totally different card...ALTHOUGH ULTRA RARE , NOT A T206....should NOT be included... 1) MASTER LIST(brown lenox, bl 460, uzit, drum, lenox black, hindu red, broadleaf 350, carolina b, hindu brown , piedy 42, cycle 460, ab 350 no frame, sov 460, ab 460, tolstoi then follow Tim, Jim, or Johns scarcity lists...17 down.... 2) subset anomaly / miscuts / (factory issued)????POSSIBLE SUBSET ![]() 3) Any scraps(pre production/ handcut/ not issued via normal distribution methods)= brown om yellow browns printers proofs freaks ect THIS IS ONLY ONE MAN'S OPINION ![]() Respectfully submitted and open to debate, JOHN VANDERBECK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Johnny,
I agree with you for the most part however with anomalies it would be an impossible list and the set would never end sort of like OJ a new one would be added every time almost. It’s just they are anomaly’s hence nor rhyme or reason or consistency. The reason I count Brown Old Mill is with the exceptions of Leon’s and the two know legit over prints there is a rhyme and reason to “Brown” Old Mill Southern League cards. They are found on a consistent series of players and with a degree of consistency in the way they look and feel much like blank backs. The others like I have in my set miscuts, mistrikes, printers freaks, factory sheet numbers etc and there are few others out there that folks aren’t aware of are just too hard to define IMO. How would one define them “Miscut Piedmont 60/40”, “Miscut Sweet Caporal 10/90” it’s just way to open to interpretation and the checklist could be infinite. I could go for this type of list…..though… T206 Basic Back Set: • All Piedmonts • All Sweet Caps • All Sovereign • All American Beauty’s • All Cycles • All Broadleaf’s • All Hindu’s • Old Mill Southern (Black) • Old Mill • Lenox • Lenox (Brown) • Polar Bear • Tolstoi • Uzit • El Principe De Gales • Drum • Carolina Brights T206 Master Back Set: • All Piedmonts • All Sweet Caps • All Sovereign • All American Beauty’s • All Cycles • All Broadleaf’s • All Hindu’s • Blank Back • Old Mill Southern (Black) • Old Mill Southern (Brown) • Old Mill • Lenox • Lenox (Brown) • Polar Bear • Tolstoi • Uzit • El Principe De Gales • Drum • Carolina Brights One could potentially add miscuts and oddities to his or her back sets as icing on the cake sort of how I see it. ![]() But cool topic and I’m always open to new ways of looking at this set. ![]() For arguments sake I left Ty Cobb off I leave that up to you guys. Cheers, John Last edited by wonkaticket; 05-19-2011 at 02:59 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
NM
Last edited by Abravefan11; 05-19-2011 at 03:19 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I might add that a controlling share (66.7%) of F.R. Penn Tobacco Co. in the form of common stock was purchased by ATC in 1904 and remained in ATC control until its dissolution in 1911, but covering the time period when the Ty Cobb brand card was issued. Thus, like all other T206s, the Ty Cobb brand card was issued in the T206 time period (1910 according to the date of ads and articles about it) by ATC as a giveaway to help advertise and stimulate sales of one of its tobacco brands.
JimB Last edited by E93; 05-19-2011 at 03:47 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very cool Jim, was not aware of that neat.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: MISC T206 T3's | grandslamcardscria | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 07-04-2010 02:29 PM |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
T205 and T206 Cards Available | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-06-2007 02:15 PM |
T206 for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 02-23-2007 07:21 PM |
My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 11:43 AM |