|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dave- having the catcher not be able to block the plate would be a whole lot safer but would change how one aspect of the game is played. Maybe they will try it next year in spring training.
Leon- Buster Posey is one of the rising stars in baseball and went last year from an unknown minor leaguer to a star of the world champion Giants. His season ended a couple of weeks ago when he both broke his ankle and tore ligaments in a home plate collision. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
My collection: http://imageevent.com/vanslykefan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rob- I don't follow the minor leagues, so to me he was unheard of until he joined the Giants. Fair point.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Response
Since the catcher could not be barreled into, I believe the other part of the rule change would prohibit the catcher from standing right in front of the base. Thus the runner would have an opportunity to realistically slide and the catcher would have to catch ball in a zone above plate and sweep tag runner....
Buster Posey is a very talented player so if it takes him to get injured to reconsider the rule than so be it.... Anyone who plays catcher has to be durable. They also have to know when to take a hit and when to move. --if you look at the Posey play again, Posey was actually positioned above plate and Cousins the Marlin's player (within the current rules) could've slid across the heart of the plate but instead went air-born and basically ended Posey's season with that decision to do so...I'm also not sure how the Posey incident has anything to do about being "durable"--the injury he sustained was not a chronic injury, etc. and no amount of durability or physical training could've prevented his injury I believe the NFL used to allow "close-line" tackles and this change in the rules has made the game safer without taking the physicality out of it. Last edited by mintacular; 06-08-2011 at 08:44 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I don't have a dog in this fight, but here is what Johnny Bench had to say about it:
"Buster was a finalist for the Johnny Bench Award (as the top collegiate catcher in 2008) and is a great kid - I called him after the World Series last year. When I heard about the injury, I was anxious to see how this happened. Buster put himself in such a bad position. First of all, my catchers don't sit in front of home plate. They stand away from home plate and work back to the plate. But we (catchers) are just fair game. You've got a guy running around third base at 210 to 220 pounds with 3 percent body fat and with sprinter's speed. I teach my kids to stay away from the plate when you don't have the ball so the runner actually sees home plate and his thought is, slide. But Buster is laying in front of home plate, and it's like having a disabled car in the middle of a four-lane highway. You're just going to get smacked. Show them the plate. You can always catch the ball and step, or step and catch the ball, as long as you've got the runner on the ground. And if you have the runner on the ground, there's less chance of any severe collision."
__________________
My collection: http://imageevent.com/vanslykefan |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Here is a video that shows the play from a few different angles, but I don't think nitpicking about if Posey or Cousins could've done something slightly different to avoid this incident then it's all good....But more so that the overall rule allows/encourages runners to slam themselves into the catcher and that is a bigger issue...
http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=15201655 Last edited by mintacular; 06-08-2011 at 08:53 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
watched
I watched the video. I don't see any need to change the rules. He was blocking the plate and that's what happens when you block the plate. I have had my share of collisions while playing. It's the physical part of the sport. BTW, if this was for enjoyment only, and they weren't making millions of dollars a year, I might say to change it. But, it's just part of the big bucks game. Just my opinion and many will think differently.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting, and a better video than the others I found.
I see it a bit different but that's the nature of close plays, always open to different interpretation. I don't think he's actually blocking all that much. He is out in front of the plate, drops the ball as it comes in and turns to make a tag with plenty of base available to the runner. (The turning after the drop explains the drop, he's rushing the play. Not uncommon at any level) the turn he makes puts the left leg in a very bad position, twisted already, forced into the dirt by his weight and with no chance of helping support from the other leg. When he gets hit, the twist is too much and the spikes hold the foot in place. I'd almost bet that the x ray shows a spiral fracture very similar to ones skiers used to get very commonly. Those have been lessened by better bindings, but still happen. And they're usually bad breaks, taking a year or more to really heal right. A couple ideas from checking the rules Had he caught the ball and lost it during the collision I think the runner should have been called out on interference. INTERFERENCE (a) Offensive interference is an act by the team at bat which interferes with, obstructs, impedes, hinders or confuses any fielder attempting to make a play. If the umpire declares the batter, batter-runner, or a runner out for interference, all other runners shall return to the last base that was in the judgment of the umpire, legally touched at the time of the interference, unless otherwise provided by these rules. As it is, Posey was probably guilty of obstruction, but the play finished with no difference between that call and the play so no call needed. Plus its tough to call a foul like that on the guy who got seriously hurt. OBSTRUCTION is the act of a fielder who, while not in possession of the ball and not in the act of fielding the ball, impedes the progress of any runner. Rule 2.00 (Obstruction) Comment: If a fielder is about to receive a thrown ball and if the ball is in flight directly toward and near enough to the fielder so he must occupy his position to receive the ball he may be considered “in the act of fielding a ball.” It is entirely up to the judgment of the umpire as to whether a fielder is in the act of fielding a ball. After a fielder has made an attempt to field a ball and missed, he can no longer be in the “act of fielding” the ball. For example: an infielder dives at a ground ball and the ball passes him and he continues to lie on the ground and delays the progress of the runner, he very likely has obstructed the runner. I think the current rules pretty much cover the situaton. The way the rules are called may not adhere to the letter of the rules, but that's probably been true for as long as we've had Baseball. There have been several guys hurt in all sports by cleats getting caught. I think the technology is there to have cleats that separate from the shoe in bad situations like this one but do the job otherwise. Having that wouldn't prevent all injuries, but would prevent a lot of them. Steve B |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange auction rules / closing time | wrapperguy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-20-2011 06:22 PM |
1941 Play Ball Joe Dimaggio PSA 6 Wrong Back Error | earlybball | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-02-2009 01:26 PM |
Long time no post | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-13-2003 12:15 PM |
OJ Printing Plate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-22-2003 01:34 PM |
time to play.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 11-24-2002 03:16 PM |