|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
There have been several posts on this forum recently regarding these cards. I have seen lots of singles from the set. Some people (like Leon) have 3 card and 5 card panels that I'm sure he'll show.
I have seen SGC give numeric grades to these cards. I have a Grove that was graded SGC 84 (see scan at bottom). From what I'm told, there is a fine size tolerance that SGC uses when deciding how to grade the particular card. Here is a link to my website which shows all of the cards from the set: http://www.bandkgreen.net/R315 More information is available at the Old Cardboard link below: http://www.oldcardboard.com/r/r315/r...?cardsetID=873
__________________
http://www.bandkgreen.net/baseballcards.htm Last edited by leftygrove10; 07-11-2011 at 03:09 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeap, we just had a recent thread about these....as far as hand cut vs factory cut...I am not sure. I think many were issued as vertical strips and that's why we see them fairly often in uncut form. On the other hand I have only seen this one horizontal type strip. As with any strip card I am sure it's how they are cut, and more importantly how close they are cut, which determines a numerical or AUT grade.....regards
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Leon.... I had not noticed this before, but your horizontal strip has four Type B cards and one Type D card (the Reynolds). I wonder why they made the Reynolds card differently? I would have thought that all of the cards on a given strip would be the same Type. For example, your vertical strip are all Type A's.
__________________
http://www.bandkgreen.net/baseballcards.htm |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have noticed that too. I really don't have a theory why they did 2 different types of printing on one strip..and I am not sure the horizontal strip was even a normal production run either, given it's scarcity.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Gents, I'll definately call SCG about any specfic card measurements in order to get a numerical grade, they were adamant that these came factory cut.
Neat story (at least I think so) as to how I got this. In the 80's I was 12 and my neighbors Grandfather called him to say he found 2 boxes of cards in his attic and would bring them by for him when he visited. Can imagine how crazy our 12 year old minds were going! He brought two boxes of 315 panels, probably had 30 in each box. We were disapointed that they were not "real" cards at the time! The Ruth was the only one that had been cut and I convinved my neighbor to give it to me. I often wonder where those boxes are now!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Could you please post a scan of your Ruth? If you don't know how, send it to me and I'll post a scan. My email address is brad_green@cox.net
__________________
http://www.bandkgreen.net/baseballcards.htm |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
About the Reynolds on Leons horizontal strip...
The "type C" and "type D" shouldnt really be a type, those 6 players are ONLY found that way and not any other way. Its just a card design difference (script name within the image) for those players and not a variation. The six players that come as ONLY type C or type D are Cissell, Clancy, Hendricks, Jolley, Reynolds, and Shires. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brad,
I wish I knew what I was looking at back then, I should have offerred my neighbor anything he wanted for them! They were all the the vertical stacks and still in the boxes! SCG sent the card on the 6th so I should have it any day. When it's in hand I'll post the scan. I'm curious what 54 members think of the cut. I assumed all of the singles were hand cut and it would not present a grading issue, unless it was a terrible cut. Last edited by brob28; 07-11-2011 at 05:08 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The same can be said for type "A" and type "B"--they are only found in that format.
Five of the 6 C/D are White Sox, only the Hendricks (sic) is not, and I believe him to be the scarcest in the set. It is unclear to me whether the C/Ds were included in the strips to replace others from the set or as additions. I believe Koenig is slightly more difficult than most--maybe he was replaced-- and personally I see fewer Lazzeri, Waner and Wilsons than the other HOFers, but I really haven't really noted any other scarcities. I believe the cards were factory cut as singles, but don't know if panels were intended to make it to the public or it just ended up that way. Some of the cards are so horribly off center, yet with straight cuts, that I find it hard to believe a human would have done that on purpose.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Sweet Cap/Hindu/Old Mill Factory 649 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-29-2008 09:24 AM |
| factory cut narrow not trim? | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2006 11:03 AM |
| Factory cut ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-01-2005 12:39 PM |
| T206 Willis Overprint w/Two Factory Designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-27-2005 01:00 PM |
| Need Some Help Confirming Existing Cards ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-30-2002 11:09 PM |