 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-05-2011, 05:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Upon further review, it will take a little while to get used to finding some things, but overall I like the look of it.
The biggest differences I see so far is: The Topps inserts/test issues are now included alphabetically be name and not by year. The "E", "T", etc. issues are not lumped together but are listed alphabetically throughout the catalog. The exhibits are not all grouped together, but are listed alphabetically throughout the catalog. Just my thoughts -Alan Last edited by alanu; 10-05-2011 at 05:28 PM. Reason: spelling 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2011 Standard Catalog pre-order at $29.69 | Bob Lemke | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-05-2010 03:34 PM |
| Vintage Index (pre 1920) for 2006 Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-19-2006 06:53 AM |
| A suggestion for Bob Lemke and the Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-06-2006 05:31 PM |
| Standard Catalog Response from Lemke. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 46 | 11-01-2005 11:09 AM |
| It's Standard Catalog cover time again | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 03-21-2004 09:00 PM |
Hybrid Mode
