|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think there is a litte confusion. VCP DOES capture BINs in their data.
My complaint was that for some reason, several of my BINs were missed in the month of February. Bobby's explanation (on page 2) was "At the beginning of the year eBay decided to change their API system and of course as we all know about them they failed to tell their licensees about it so there was a time period we where not pulling all the data. Since then we were finally able to implement a workaround in March and the reports of missing transaction dropped dramatically." I can understand that. Things happen. My beef is the fact that I pointed it out to him and his response was basically, "Tough crap, it's too late." Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 10-28-2011 at 10:38 AM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
from B&L, and correct me if I'm wrong -- but the software designer is making decisions on what to do with the data from the B&L auction.
If so, on a global level that brings into issue, who really "owns" the data from a B&L auction, is it the auction house or is it the software provider. I'm just curious as to your opinion on that part of this puzzle. Rich I missed Leon's response, and I agree with what he did. Last edited by Rich Klein; 10-28-2011 at 04:55 PM. Reason: Not enough reading of Leon's posts |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Wonder how many B&L bidders know/care who's the software provider... I couldn't care less. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
IMO, the auction house owns the data, but the software company is charging to execute the feed (or install the API code) from the auction house to VCP.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The auction company owns the data however, it is on the internet therefore public domain information at that point (I am not sure if I am using the correct legal term). Prior to us (SimpleAuction) giving the feed to VCP, we always ask the auction company if they want THEIR information sourced to VCP.
As for charging for this information, I can understand the desire to do so (everyone is looking to add more streams of revenue) because there is ongoing maintenance and someone has to be paid for doing the initial development work. We choose not to because we have worked out an agreement with VCP. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA Graded 50s-60s; Mays, Cox RC, Ted Williams; Priced near or Below VCP Average | BIN at VCP | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 08-03-2010 01:58 PM |
| O/T VCP vs Card Pricer | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-28-2009 06:53 AM |
| VCP vs. AOL | Jim VB | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 07-17-2009 08:38 PM |
| Cardpricer vs. VCP? | jlynch1960 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-15-2009 07:42 AM |
| VCP price change | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 88 | 07-29-2008 06:24 PM |