|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Good post, Larry!   I'd think it's probably safe to add Wagner to that list along with Ruth, Gehrig, Cobb, and Matty. | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			What I don't get is how the Goudey Ruth and Gehrigs are so pricey when there were so many of each in the sets, and apparently there were tons printed. I can understand the non-Goudeys of these two, but if I were investing in a Goudey Ruth or Gehrig, it would have to be high-grade.
		 
				__________________ $co++ Forre$+ | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			When selling a card though, don't you have to pay fees?  I know if I sell something on ebay I have to pay an ebay fee and a paypal fee.  Isn't it hard to "make money" selling cards if you always have to overcome a ~20% hurdle just to break even?  What about taxes?
		 Last edited by jezzeaepi; 10-30-2011 at 01:05 AM. | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 The Goudey cards are probably closest to being liquid (if there is such a thing) due to the popularity of the set(s). The 1934 Goudey Gehrig #37 is iconic and will likely always find a buyer. Cobb and Wagner are probably the safest bets (in that order), but Matty, Ruth, Gehrig aren't far behind and are in the same discussion. If non-collectors have heard of them (Cobb, Wagner, Ruth and Gehrig all qualify), then you know there is collectibility there. Collectibility breeds demand, which raises cost. | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Like any other investment, diversification would be the key.  Buying a high end, expensive card is akin to putting all your money in the stock market.  There is a greater upside, but also a greater downside.  By buying a wide range of cards from different eras, you are better protecting the downside of your investment, although your appreciation may be slower.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			It was what I like to call "an aside".  I got off-track, sorry for that, but thanks for your thoughts.
		 
				__________________ $co++ Forre$+ | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |