Oh No! Not another T206 Question!

[fkw]

more images on this post...
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...=T206+chemical

[tedzan]

Maybe those other T206's are whatever....however, the cards I have shown here were all glued in an album for 80+ years when I acquired them.

Therefore, they were not "soaked", or subject to "fading", or affected by "chemicals". They are simply....printing flaws. I have quite a few more cards
from various other sets that have similar printing flaws (i.e., missing an ink pass in the multi-color printing process).


TED Z

[bbcard1]

As someone who has done a fair amount of printing in my life, I am with Ted Z...I think something was laying on the plate on one of the color passes. Closer examination may persuade me differently. OTOH, I can't see why anyone would pay a premium for them....

[iwantitiwinit]

I also feel it is not a chemical stain, if it were a stain I beleive not only the background would be discolored but the so would the player pose. also if it were a chemical stain wouldn't it soak throught o the reverse and discolor the ink there?