|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's reasonably obvious that no fewer than three distinct hands were involved in signing those baseballs. Thus, regardless of what Nash has done in the past, at least 2/3 of them are forgeries.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
that first photo where it shows three distinctly different styles, that says it all for me.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What's the most interesting collection you've heard of that is not yours? | almostdone | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 08-07-2011 07:49 PM |
| Share an interesting fact about a t206 player | David R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 46 | 10-18-2010 09:26 PM |
| Interesting & Funny 19th Century Baseball Stories | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-02-2009 07:21 PM |
| Interesting story regarding the T-206 Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-29-2007 06:27 PM |
| I saw three very interesting items today (N310 Anson, E90-1 Clarke, E103 Lajoie) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-18-2004 08:18 AM |