|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would assume this is on a Lee MacPhail or older ball?? I'm not that familiar with his old style, which I assume this is or is trying to be? It has characteristics I like and some I don't. For starters, I don't like the way the first M has 2 different pen pressures. I also don't really like the shape of the M's, though it could be more like his early sig, I don't know? I don't like baselines of Mickey or Mantle (droopy c, droopy a). I especially don't like that the "i" is not dotted. All 50+ items in my collection have a dotted "i" for whatever that's worth. I don't like the "tle" and the straight plane it's on.
I do like the apparent speed it was signed with, causing the pen to skip? I do like there is a slight "heavy spot' where the first "M" starts. I do like the interaction between the "Ma". Personally, I couldn't say one way or another as much of my research does not include older versions. I imagine some characteristics are the same, but really don't know. The Lowly Mantle Collector wouldn't buy it, but I am buying less and less these days anyway...
Last edited by Fuddjcal; 12-14-2011 at 02:52 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks very much, Chuck.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
, but I had the same reaction. The pen pressure and speed appears to be inconsistant and that is a concern. That said, if this is a fake, it's relatively deceptive and certainly a cut above the mass produced junk.
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks, Steve.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
That version looks slightly similiar to this 1962 team ball posted for sale at Grandstand Sports. http://grandstandsports.com/pages/49337.htm
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bump.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't like it. The spacing of Mickey is off. It looks drawn to me. I think it's a pretty good fake.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Although I'm not a Mantle expert, IMO the blue ink looks too 'fresh', almost as if it was signed yesterday. My initial gut feeling is to pass.....David, what are your thoughts? You've been around autographs for a long time.
Matt |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Would it be dumb to say I like the "Mantle", but the "Mickey" looks suspect? I know it's either all-real or all-fake, but that's how I keep seeing it. Sorry to be of no help... I guess that's about as non-committal as it gets!
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| . | scmavl | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 4 | 01-06-2012 01:24 PM |
| Ruth ball & The National | ScottR81 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 08-11-2011 12:45 AM |
| Shellac on Ball | Zach Wheat | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 07-22-2011 11:10 PM |
| FS: T206, Pre-1950, 1950s, 1960s Vintage Baseball HOF Singles w/ Mantle Collection | vintagegem2 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 02-23-2011 10:20 PM |
| 1971 NL All Star Team signed ball with 24 sigs including Clemente | LEIDEMEG | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 08-29-2010 09:41 PM |