 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27
12-15-2011, 06:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Are duplicate answers allowed? Before scrolling through the other suggestions, I came up with 2 and 5.5. So if I'm allowed to duplicate another, I'll stick with that. (I could be swayed to 1.5 and 5.5, but someone else already guessed that too, so I'll stick with my initial.)
Thanks for sharing, --S
__________________
collecting primarily T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, 1952 Bowman, 1964 Topps Giants, Yankees HOFers. E-mails preferred over PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A New Idea for Grading Photographic Cards | barrysloate | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-02-2011 10:10 AM |
| Grading discussion- Revolutionizing :) the hobby... | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 70 | 11-19-2010 03:17 PM |
| Should Seller Reimburse Buyer For Grading Fees? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 11-24-2009 11:08 PM |
| What is it, exactly, about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-27-2006 09:42 AM |
| Grading Co. Burlesque | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-12-2003 10:18 PM |
Threaded Mode