Is there a way to remove a JSA sticker? - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2011, 01:03 PM
Tom Hufford Tom Hufford is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 158
Default Just for publicity

Any company that would put a permanent adhesive sticker anywhere on an object - especially on the front - has no respect whatsoever for the history, value, or integrity of the object. All they are really trying to do is to place an ad for themselves where it is sure to be seen.

And, an ad for what? The logo (signature?) on the pictured sticker really can't even be read - some other companies do use a logo or block lettering that can be read. But, 25 or 50 years from now, if someone were to run across an item with one of these stickere on it, what would they think? Who was stupid enough back then to do this? And will the company still be in business, or the computer database maintained anywhere, so that the numbers on the stickers will even have any meaning.

Do they need something to show that it has been authenticated? Since supposedly the authenticators have already left a bit of their DNA or whatever somewhere on the item, a Certificate of Authenticity that includes a photo of the item would do just fine.

I'm absolutely certain that if anyone submitted the Mona Lisa to one of these companies for authentication, it would probably come back with one of the stupid stickers right beside her smile.

Just my (less than) 2 cents worth.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2011, 01:07 PM
drc drc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,621
Default

I woiuld imagine the sticker is sturdier than the paper underneath, so you will have paper loss if you try and remove it. I'd just leave it on.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2011, 01:52 PM
Vintagedegu Vintagedegu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 197
Default

-

Last edited by Vintagedegu; 08-21-2014 at 03:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2011, 05:46 PM
Tigerden Tigerden is offline
Adam B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 382
Default

Packs BTW-that is a beautiful signature of the Mick. Yes, it is ashame they decided to slap that sticker on the front cover as opposed to a more discreet location like the back of the magazine. I have a few signed Sports Illustrated magazines that have the original mailing stamp on the front which are alot larger then the Spence sticker, but they don't bother me at all. Hell, maybe just for spite you could slap one of those Chiquita Bananna stickers over it. Richard is correct, probably just another way of getting free advertising.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2011, 07:49 PM
egbeachley's Avatar
egbeachley egbeachley is offline
Eric Bea.chley
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerden View Post
Packs BTW-that is a beautiful signature of the Mick.
I thought one of the easiest things to look for on a fake is the lack of the flick-up on the second M.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-17-2011, 07:04 PM
Fuddjcal Fuddjcal is offline
Chuck Tapia
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by egbeachley View Post
I thought one of the easiest things to look for on a fake is the lack of the flick-up on the second M.
IMHO, 95% of the time you'll see the flick, 10% you won't. You might even see a slight blot of ink where his pen pressure changes. This one actually does has a slight flick which is good enough for me along with other portions of the autograph. This one is a BLAZER!

Some forgeries actually have no flick, and some are down right buffoonish in their attempt to slowly move from M to a. Almost like a fourth grader.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-17-2011, 07:44 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,273
Default

There is a slight flick but its hard to see in my photo. You can see it better in this close up of the signature. Aside from my knowing that it's unquestionably authentic (signed at a show), another thing I look for in Mantle signatures is that the signature is on one even plane.


Last edited by packs; 12-17-2011 at 07:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-17-2011, 09:13 PM
Lordstan's Avatar
Lordstan Lordstan is offline
M@rk V3l@rd3
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 3,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuddjcal View Post
IMHO, 95% of the time you'll see the flick, 10% you won't.
Chuck,
I love your math.
Any chance you're related to Yogi?
__________________
My signed 1934 Goudey set(in progress).
https://flic.kr/s/aHsjFuyogy

Other interests/sets/collectibles.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/96571220@N08/albums

My for sale or trade photobucket album
https://flic.kr/s/aHsk7c1SRL
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-18-2011, 08:51 AM
thekingofclout's Avatar
thekingofclout thekingofclout is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordstan View Post
Chuck,
I love your math.
Any chance you're related to Yogi?
Classic!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-16-2011, 03:29 PM
perezfan's Avatar
perezfan perezfan is offline
M@RK ST€!NBERG
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Hufford View Post
Any company that would put a permanent adhesive sticker anywhere on an object - especially on the front - has no respect whatsoever for the history, value, or integrity of the object. All they are really trying to do is to place an ad for themselves where it is sure to be seen.

And, an ad for what? The logo (signature?) on the pictured sticker really can't even be read - some other companies do use a logo or block lettering that can be read. But, 25 or 50 years from now, if someone were to run across an item with one of these stickere on it, what would they think? Who was stupid enough back then to do this? And will the company still be in business, or the computer database maintained anywhere, so that the numbers on the stickers will even have any meaning.

Do they need something to show that it has been authenticated? Since supposedly the authenticators have already left a bit of their DNA or whatever somewhere on the item, a Certificate of Authenticity that includes a photo of the item would do just fine.

I'm absolutely certain that if anyone submitted the Mona Lisa to one of these companies for authentication, it would probably come back with one of the stupid stickers right beside her smile.

Just my (less than) 2 cents worth.
This could not have been stated any better. The sticker represents a lack of reverance and respect for the item itself. And it shows how the Authentication Companies care most about promoting their own product.

I realize that the owner of the item is given this option upon submission... but perhaps it should no longer be an option! And how can JSA/PSA possibly justify stickering the front side??? I saw this recently on an Index Card as well. Just neglectful and mindless, IMO...

With that said, don't try to remove the damn thing... The tearing/smudging/discoloration it would create would look even worse. You still have a great piece, and I love how Mantle slapped a gorgeous "king sized" autograph in the perfect spot

Last edited by perezfan; 12-16-2011 at 04:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-16-2011, 03:40 PM
David Atkatz's Avatar
David Atkatz David Atkatz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,126
Default

The placing of these stickers just shows how unprofessional and ignorant these companies are. The first thing a museum or archive curator will tell you is "do NOTHING to an artifact that cannot be undone without damage."
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-16-2011, 03:56 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,273
Default

Thanks everyone for chiming in. It sounds like I'm stuck with it. I wouldn't mind paying a restorer a hundred bucks if they could definitely remove it. If anyone tries to remove a sticker from an inexpenseive item I'd love to hear about the results.

By the way, does anyone know a good restorer in the Bay Area?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-16-2011, 04:02 PM
Shoeless Moe Shoeless Moe is offline
Paul Gruszka aka P Diddy, Cambo, Fluke, Jagr, PG13, Bon Jokey, Paulie Walnuts
Pa.ul Grus.zka
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Over by there
Posts: 5,016
Default I actually prefer the sticker on the front

Attached Images
File Type: jpg RuthBall.jpg (67.6 KB, 171 views)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-16-2011, 04:12 PM
mr2686 mr2686 is offline
Mike Rich@rds0n
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ca
Posts: 3,203
Default

Damn Paul, you made me shoot soda out of my nose
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-16-2011, 05:17 PM
John V's Avatar
John V John V is offline
John
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Central South Carolina
Posts: 956
Default

Have you contacted the knuckleheads to ask if their stickers are easy to remove? It could be simpler and less risky than you think.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-17-2011, 11:56 AM
Mr. Zipper Mr. Zipper is offline
Steve Zarelli
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,603
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
Thanks everyone for chiming in. It sounds like I'm stuck with it. I wouldn't mind paying a restorer a hundred bucks if they could definitely remove it. If anyone tries to remove a sticker from an inexpenseive item I'd love to hear about the results.

By the way, does anyone know a good restorer in the Bay Area?
PM sent.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-17-2011, 01:02 PM
travrosty travrosty is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,223
Default

What really gets me is when they do this to rare photos, and baseballs.

one "authenticator" graded a ball that already had the sticker of another company on it, and did not take anything off of the grade even though the ball had a foregin object on it (sticker). Now if that sticker would have been a chiquita banana sticker, the grade of the ball would have dropped substantially, but because it was an ABC sticker, they didnt take anything off of the grade.

My question is why?

both ABC and a chiquita banana sticker are foreign objects attached the ball, detracting from it. but one is okay and the other is not.

its a crazy world, who can understand the craziness anymore?

Last edited by travrosty; 12-17-2011 at 01:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JSA Story on Autographalert.com sports-rings Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 142 04-22-2011 09:50 AM
JSA Story on Autographalert.com 4815162342 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 44 02-16-2011 06:05 AM
1925 Yankees Team Signed ball with Babe Ruth (JSA) from Nov B/S/T tread Archive Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 0 11-06-2008 09:52 AM
Interesting bit of info re JSA Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 05-27-2006 02:36 PM
Soaking t205's to remove scrapbook residue Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 02-07-2002 05:04 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM.


ebay GSB