|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks for your help. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Basically it is focus. Sometimes you'll see a card that appears like you have double vision when looking at it; and that would be a card with poor registration. Or when the colors don't fall in line where they should.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Generally I think SGC is a bit tougher especially since tightening their criteria on centering but one could find exceptions from both. All the cards from both sides are graded by humans. That said, PSA is so tough on crossovers it seems like they just reject crossovers most of the time on general principal. I have not gotten than impression from SGC.
In terms of re-sale value today I think a blanket claim of PSA for post-war and SGC for pre-war is a bit simplistic. JimB |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Regarding resale value, this is what they say on the PSA boards on why PSA is superior. On ebay, in the search criteria, enter both SGC and PSA to see which listings use both TPG's as keywords to get more hits. On the results screen, you will see the vast majority are SGC cards looking to capitalize on the PSA keyword rather than PSA cards looking to add collectors of SGC cards.
Last edited by glchen; 12-21-2011 at 03:16 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I prefer SGC far more than PSA...Sgc slabs break much easier and generally break "clean" vs PSA slabs which splinter more, require more force and leave bits of the slab in my carpet for the dog to find and chew. In the end, they both break and give you that "fix" that was needed. Merry Christmas!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have mostly caramels in my collection, and without question, I prefer SGC. SGC holders present the card better, while the newer PSA holders have my card floating around and that drives me nuts. SGC is more accurate and tougher on the caramels as well. You'll find a good bit of paper loss on PSA 2's that SGC will make 1's upon arrival. PSA cards may trade higher at times b/c of their registry, but I'll take SGC cards over PSA cards any day for pre-war. Just my preference.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I only collect T206 and I started out as a PSA guy, not really knowing that SGC existed. In the last 18 months I've switched to SGC for three reasons:
- Quick turnaround, primarily due to USPS registered mail. With SGC in NJ (and me in MD), it's much faster than the cross-country trip to CA. - The appearance of the card in the slab - A general preference of SGC by many other T206 collectors who favor SGC That said, I have seen many more "bargains" in SGC holders than PSA holders. Yesterday I looked at the ten cheapest (auction, including shipping) eBay cards sold in PSA3 and SGC40; PSA averaged around $30, with SGC under $29. I also did a search and found instances where the PSA version sold more than the SGC (again at these same grades), and others where SGC was higher. Obviously these are small samples, but I haven't seen definitive proof that the same card would sell higher in one slab than the other (at least at the grade level I collect). Happy Collecting to all, regardless of your slab or lack thereof! |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA Graded Stars 1968-1976 | OldSchoolBaseball | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 25 | 02-05-2012 05:06 PM |
| T206 For Sale: 220 cards, Almost 50% of set | Julian Wells | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-01-2010 05:34 PM |
| 29 T207 cards graded PSA 5,6 SGC 60 | daviddbreadman | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 11-09-2009 11:55 PM |
| Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2009 11:05 AM |
| T201 MIDGRADE SET SGC PSA GRADED *NOW SOLD* | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 02-09-2008 11:16 AM |