|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I prefer SGC far more than PSA...Sgc slabs break much easier and generally break "clean" vs PSA slabs which splinter more, require more force and leave bits of the slab in my carpet for the dog to find and chew. In the end, they both break and give you that "fix" that was needed. Merry Christmas!
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have mostly caramels in my collection, and without question, I prefer SGC. SGC holders present the card better, while the newer PSA holders have my card floating around and that drives me nuts. SGC is more accurate and tougher on the caramels as well. You'll find a good bit of paper loss on PSA 2's that SGC will make 1's upon arrival. PSA cards may trade higher at times b/c of their registry, but I'll take SGC cards over PSA cards any day for pre-war. Just my preference.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I only collect T206 and I started out as a PSA guy, not really knowing that SGC existed. In the last 18 months I've switched to SGC for three reasons:
- Quick turnaround, primarily due to USPS registered mail. With SGC in NJ (and me in MD), it's much faster than the cross-country trip to CA. - The appearance of the card in the slab - A general preference of SGC by many other T206 collectors who favor SGC That said, I have seen many more "bargains" in SGC holders than PSA holders. Yesterday I looked at the ten cheapest (auction, including shipping) eBay cards sold in PSA3 and SGC40; PSA averaged around $30, with SGC under $29. I also did a search and found instances where the PSA version sold more than the SGC (again at these same grades), and others where SGC was higher. Obviously these are small samples, but I haven't seen definitive proof that the same card would sell higher in one slab than the other (at least at the grade level I collect). Happy Collecting to all, regardless of your slab or lack thereof! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Erick- you must keep in mind that with cheaper cards there will not be alot of difference. However, when you are talking about grades of 6 and higher, psa is significantly higher in price.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The higher prices in higher grades in PSA holders are mainly due to registry collectors, imo. They are what they are though. PSA vs SGC vs BVG......choices are good for collectors and the hobby in general. Overall all three companies do a good job. I have my preferences just as everyone else has theirs. best regards and happy holidays...
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is a card I consigned with PWCC last month. It had a final sell price of just under $500 (SMR value=$1,100).
![]() Same card as a PSA 9 sold last year for $1,400. That is the main reason I prefer PSA over SGC. I don't know of ANY card collector who likes to leave that much money on the table. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA Graded Stars 1968-1976 | OldSchoolBaseball | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 25 | 02-05-2012 05:06 PM |
| T206 For Sale: 220 cards, Almost 50% of set | Julian Wells | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-01-2010 05:34 PM |
| 29 T207 cards graded PSA 5,6 SGC 60 | daviddbreadman | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 11-09-2009 11:55 PM |
| Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2009 11:05 AM |
| T201 MIDGRADE SET SGC PSA GRADED *NOW SOLD* | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 02-09-2008 11:16 AM |