Do-over. heritage relists no sale psa, jsa 1939 controversial signedinduction program

[travrosty]

Here are the Cy Young signatures for the psa and jsa certed items that went for 41000 dollars respectively and the one in pencil that is currently up at heritage, that was also up last summer but went unsold.

These two signatures of Young, unlike the rest, actually seem very similar, and its quite possible they were signed by the same hand, unfortunately in my opinion, it was not in the hand of Cy Young.

You can see the autographs kind of aimlessly skip along with weak purpose, with shallow valleys in the u and n in Young, instead of the purposeful, distinct higher valleys and peaks we usually see in authentic versions of Young's signature, as shown on Haulsofshame.com.

These both got passed by jsa and psa, but should they have?

[thekingofclout]

So, are all of you that now support Peter Nash and his website HaulsofShame.com - do you now believe that Rob Lifson is a bad guy?

[RichardSimon]

Originally Posted by thekingofclout

So, are all of you that now support Peter Nash and his website HaulsofShame.com - do you now believe that Rob Lifson is a bad guy?

What does one issue have to do with the other?
These are two entirely separate issues.
Rob and I have communicated on a few occasions, he has written to me about several things (not Nash) that have provided information to me. He has expressed his appreciation to me for the efforts I have made in fighting forgeries.
Rob has never mentioned Peter Nash to me.
Peter Nash and I have communicated on a few occasions. He has introduced me to someone, in law enforcement, who may prove to be a very valuable ally in the fight against forgeries.
Peter has never mentioned Rob Lifson to me.
I think someone can believe and support what Nash has put on his website and absolutely not think anything negative about Rob Lifson.

[thekingofclout]

Originally Posted by RichardSimon

What does one issue have to do with the other?
These are two entirely separate issues.

Bingo Richard. That's why the sign is at the end of my comment.

Now, I admit that I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but that is exactly how I see this thread.

[thekingofclout]

Originally Posted by RichardSimon

Rob and I have communicated on a few occasions, he has written to me about several things (not Nash) that have provided information to me. He has expresses his appreciation to me for the efforts I have made in fighting forgeries.
Rob has never mentioned Peter Nash to me.
Peter Nash and I have communicated on a few occasions. He has introduced me to someone, in law enforcement, who may prove to be a very valuable ally in the fight against forgeries.
Peter has never mentioned Rob Lifson to me.
I think someone can believe and support what Nash has put on his website and absolutely not think anything negative about Rob Lifson.

Well Richard. Since you added all of that after I responded to you, I now feel it necessary to explain that my original comment was a euphemism regarding how completely haywire this thread had become.

Please give Rob and Peter my best regards.

[RichardSimon]

Originally Posted by thekingofclout

Well Richard. Since you added all of that after I responded to you, I now feel it necessary to explain that my original comment was a euphemism regarding how completely haywire this thread had become.

Please give Rob and Peter my best regards.

I don't think this thread has gone completely haywire. Just one of those threads that has gotten some of the people involved in it to become a little emotional . We have had a few of those before, haven't we?