Now isn't this just beautiful

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Forever Young

It is not PSA's call or fault.

Really? I want you for my judge if I do something wrong. Who's fault is it? Judge Judy's? SGC's? Unless PSA gave the sticker to the submitter then they put it on there. Maybe I don't understand.

[batsballsbases]

Originally Posted by Leon

Really? I want you for my judge if I do something wrong. Who's fault is it? Judge Judy's? SGC's? Unless PSA gave the sticker to the submitter then they put it on there. Maybe I don't understand.

Leon,
I think Judge Judy may be in on it. She just finished a house about 10 minutes from me. Google Judge Judy House and you will see what Im talking about!

[travrosty]

They slap their advertising on everything to the detriment of the piece. i cringe everytime I see something like that.

[Forever Young]

Originally Posted by Leon

Really? I want you for my judge if I do something wrong. Who's fault is it? Judge Judy's? SGC's? Unless PSA gave the sticker to the submitter then they put it on there. Maybe I don't understand.

Wrong??? Says who??? Many want it on there. Maybe it is I who doesn't understand....

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Forever Young

Wrong??? Says who??? Many want it on there. Maybe it is I who doesn't understand....

In my opinion any company that gets paid to authenticate an item, and puts a sticker on it that defaces it, is wrong. If a customer wants that then that is not a service an authentication company should provide, imo. I doubt if you call Toyota and ask them to sell you a destroyed new Camry, they would do it. Yes, imo and almost everyone (even the people that agree with the idiocy) here thinks it is defacing the item. Just my opinion that it is wrong. Maybe a poll is in order?

[RichardSimon]

Right you are Leon,,, poll commencing.