|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
All four corners show creases. Good.
Agree with Dan about keeping it raw. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Closer to gd than vg but a good candidate for a 2.5
JimB |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good feedback because I was thinking about buying it, guy wants close to 200 and if it's VG I would offer close to that but Good seems a little high at close to 200. I was leaning more toward Good too so I don't know about paying close to 200 now
Last edited by zljones; 02-23-2012 at 08:33 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
+1. Haven't visited for awhile--hope everyone's doing well!
Regards, Larry |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Dollar Paid For Ultra High Grade Cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-07-2008 08:45 AM |
| Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2006 09:05 PM |
| Problems with requesting an "authentic" grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-27-2006 06:44 AM |
| Change it up: Post you low grade, high grades! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-28-2006 06:58 AM |
| Strongly against the "Authentic" grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-01-2002 11:30 AM |