T205 Graham discussion

[Wite3]

Still not convinced especially since your two links show that the sig. Is black on pied. 25...still have not seen a piedmont 25 blue scan yet...I would consider this a variation like cycle Matty...

Btw...do people consider the different m or e cards(like globe, Indianapolis brewing, sporting news, etc.) which use the same format, same pics, but different advertising as different sets or variations? I view the Matty cycle just like this..not a variation but a different card set or subset with different advertising.

Joshua

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Wite3

Still not convinced especially since your two links show that the sig. Is black on pied. 25...still have not seen a piedmont 25 blue scan yet...I would consider this a variation like cycle Matty...

Btw...do people consider the different m or e cards(like globe, Indianapolis brewing, sporting news, etc.) which use the same format, same pics, but different advertising as different sets or variations? I view the Matty cycle just like this..not a variation but a different card set or subset with different advertising.

Joshua

I will defer to your reasoning on this Piedmont color issue....but in answer to the other part....
.
.
For me, the M101-4/5 ad backs are different sets, can be collected that way, but are categorized according to the American Card Catalog numbering scheme. Several of the ads have their own designation but most don't.

Just wanted to see if anyone has added anymore to their collection or may have came across something else. Made a call to SGC and never got a response. Not suprised but I thought they would atleast make a return call.

Also to add I would say this card should be added to the basic set list since it is not an error card. Any thoughts on this?