|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is the T206 P350 Schulte Scrap or Factory Cut? | |||
| The P350 Schulte is Printer's Scrap |
|
5 | 6.33% |
| The P350 Schulte is Factory Cut |
|
52 | 65.82% |
| I'm not sure |
|
9 | 11.39% |
| I really don't care |
|
13 | 16.46% |
| Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
No choice for both?
Factory cut, and probably a scrap as well. Steve B |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Borders are a tiny bit wavy but not enough to make me think it was handcut. There's some indenting towards the middle but that, and the creases, give me the impression the card was held together with some others using a rubber band.
Colors on the card look ok but I'm by no means a t206 expert. Is there a particular argument I should be considering on why this could be printer's scrap? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's possible that one or more examples of the Schulte with a Piedmont 350 back will show up. It's a card that could easily go unnoticed in many collections. For the time being it's interesting to ponder this one. Last edited by Abravefan11; 05-05-2012 at 04:13 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[QUOTE=Abravefan11;990461]It's a card that could easily go unnoticed in many collections. [QUOTE]
+1 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not sure whether the card is scrap or not. But what about the mark at the top? I'll concede that it's highly probable that it's just a squiggle added by a collector sometime after production (like the indecipherable marks on thousands of other T206s). On the other hand, it seems at least possible that it's a crude crop mark, "8" or other layout designation added at the factory. To me it adds to the card's mystique.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Scot - That's a really interesting observation. I say this because another collector contacted me a few days ago with a scan of one of his cards with a similar mark on the back. He asked if I thought that his and the mark on the Schulte could have been from the factory just as your proposed. I told him that though they looked similar I didn't think either were done at the factory. I thought like you the likely explanation was they were similar stray marks added by a collector. I don't know what use these markings would be to the factory, but there's always an outside chance they could have been used for something. Here is an image of his cards mark and the Schulte mark.
Last edited by Abravefan11; 05-06-2012 at 12:51 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I voted factory cut. Interesting poll and observations.
Thanks, guys. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Ames, Larry Doyle & Schulte Mystery ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 08-15-2011 07:29 PM |
| R315's factory cut? | brob28 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-22-2011 11:14 PM |
| T206 two factory back for sale | drumback | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 03-26-2011 04:28 AM |
| T206 PIEDMONT 460 factory 42 back color difference | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-01-2010 06:04 PM |
| On Ebay: T206 Blackburne Old Mill, T206 Schulte back view, T206 Doolin/Doolan, T207 Street | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2007 09:07 AM |