Disgraceful lier

[perezfan]

It's liar, with an "a" (not an "e"). Just correcting some spelling

[barrysloate]

Originally Posted by perezfan

It's liar, with an "a" (not an "e"). Just correcting some spelling

I'm glad somebody other than me pointed it out....

[perezfan]

Originally Posted by barrysloate

I'm glad somebody other than me pointed it out....

It just eats away at you after reading it over and over...

[barrysloate]

It's like somebody scratching a piece of chalk across a blackboard....

[perezfan]

Especially when it resides in the title, and is meant to convey a powerful statement!

It's so jarring, that I have to give it shocked, angry, sad, and embarrassed faces. Impossible to pick just one...

[docpatlv]

Originally Posted by perezfan

It's liar, with an "a" (not an "e"). Just correcting some spelling

I think this is the technicality that's going to get Scott off the hook. He wasn't calling Jeff a disgraceful "liar", he was calling him a disgraceful "lier". Perhaps Scott heard a rumor that Jeff has a physical disability that does not allow him to lie down properly in the horizontal position. Or maybe when Jeff sleeps at night he takes up more than half the bed. Maybe these sleeping qualities are disgraceful to Scott. Either way I think it's a little bit overboard to threaten to sue someone for calling you out on your sleeping habits.

But that's just my humble opinion, what the hell do I know.

Mike

[GrayGhost]

[Wymers Auction]

Originally Posted by docpatlv

I think this is the technicality that's going to get Scott off the hook. He wasn't calling Jeff a disgraceful "liar", he was calling him a disgraceful "lier". Perhaps Scott heard a rumor that Jeff has a physical disability that does not allow him to lie down properly in the horizontal position. Or maybe when Jeff sleeps at night he takes up more than half the bed. Maybe these sleeping qualities are disgraceful to Scott. Either way I think it's a little bit overboard to threaten to sue someone for calling you out on your sleeping habits.

But that's just my humble opinion, what the hell do I know.

Mike

Better be careful he will turn this into a class action suit. I am sorry I could not help myself.

[drc]

I agree. I interpreted it to mean someone liked to take naps on the couch.

[Splinte1941]

As a resident asshole on this board, I'd like to weigh in on this issue from the potential legal angle that was addressed earlier.

If the glove doesnt fit, you must acquit.

[jgmp123]

Originally Posted by docpatlv

I think this is the technicality that's going to get Scott off the hook. He wasn't calling Jeff a disgraceful "liar", he was calling him a disgraceful "lier". Perhaps Scott heard a rumor that Jeff has a physical disability that does not allow him to lie down properly in the horizontal position. Or maybe when Jeff sleeps at night he takes up more than half the bed. Maybe these sleeping qualities are disgraceful to Scott. Either way I think it's a little bit overboard to threaten to sue someone for calling you out on your sleeping habits.

But that's just my humble opinion, what the hell do I know.

Mike

+1! Bravo Bravo!!

[perezfan]

Agree - Brilliant post!

[RichardSimon]

Scott - never sweat the small sh--. And this threat is really small sh--.

[ibuysportsephemera]

Scott, I will defend you if you get sued...I am not an attorney but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.


Jeff

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by perezfan

Agree - Brilliant post!

+1.

The obvious fact is that when a "lier" says he's going to sue, he's really going to do nothing other than to provide us with entertainment.

[BigJJ]

Scott, this guy wrote you act with "malicious" and "illicit" "behavior". You had NO self interest in your doing what you did, it was selfless. Nothing is remotely "malicious" or "illicit"!!?? I am an attorney. Truth is a defense to slander. You have a defense. And authenticators on this board could sum up that ball for you in a succinct letter with clear picture references - that any person not in the business would understand in a second. Even better, can find you another such ball! Not difficult.
What is his defense for his statements?
"illicit" - if he actually brought a suit, and you were found to not have committed something "illicit", and he has written "illicit", he is not in good territory.
Surprised since he contacted his attorney so quick, wink wink, that his attorney would have let him make such posts damaging to his 'case'.

[BrandonG]

Wow! I go on vacation for 3 days and look what I missed! lol