 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-02-2013, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Upper Deck Authentication Refuses to discuss ANY holograms from pre-2002
I felt like I should put this on record. UD used to issue on site holograms during the late 80s throughout the 90s. This is the second time I have a holo that is older and I called to verify it. Each time they asked me what the item was (I mean shouldn't they know that?) Each time I was told that they are not allowed to discuss or comment on holograms issued before 2002.
I have the actual COA with mail in registration and everything from the other item (a reggie jackson bat) and they also said they cannot discuss any items from before 2002. I mean what excuse do they possibly have have? For me this is a minor issue. What about people who have spent thousands on UDA items at shows or through dealers who basically have no verifiable COA anymore even though they paid a premium for those items.. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MLB Authentication holograms with same numbers? | djson1 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 04-20-2013 10:45 PM |
| WTB: 87 Topps or 89 Upper Deck lot | Matthew80 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 3 | 09-11-2012 12:00 AM |
| FS:2002 Upper Deck Josh Hamilton Signature Collection | greenmonster66 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 5 | 07-27-2012 04:19 PM |
| OT: Upper Deck suing, well Upper Deck | Rich Klein | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-05-2011 09:40 PM |
| I get that Upper Deck was a butcher, but... | T206Collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 06-22-2011 11:11 PM |
Threaded Mode