|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  T206 Reprint... is it obvious to y'all? 
			
			Hey guys,  I'm curious if everyone knows this is a reprint at first glance? I took a chance .... Yep reprint. | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Yeah I would have been suspicious at first glance, that black ink used on the name is a dead giveaway.  Should be dark brown. The rest if the card does look good to me, I may be missing some other clues though. 
				__________________ Collecting Pre-1920 HOF Postcards (single subject, not team postcards) @TreyCumby Last edited by chipperhank44; 11-08-2014 at 11:07 AM. | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Agree the black ink name is the dead givaway.  At second glance, the corners also seem artificially rounded.  Overall, it is a decent job, so don't beat yourself up too much. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 
				__________________ T206: 130/518  T206 HZ: 6/6  T206 SLers: 48/48  T206 back run: 21/38   | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			The colors are off in several places, like his glove, fingers, and the W on the uniform. I only noticed because I am looking for a real card of Bill in similar condition. | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			The black ink was obvious when I pulled it from the package. With it in hand it was obvious in many ways; size, texture, gloss, card stock. The seller sold as possible reprints but I'm sure he knew they were reprints. It was just a $28 chance on 4 cards so I've got some reprints and a lesson learned.
		 Last edited by Mountaineer1999; 11-08-2014 at 11:27 AM. | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Yeah, when they say "possible reprint" it is definitely a reprint.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Yeah. That makes sense. I'm not too bright. If there wasn't other dim people out there bidding against me I would have saved some money.... Of course that was probably the seller bidding.    | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Don't beat yourself up too much. We all make mistakes, pay too much, or make trades and sales that we regret. This was actually not a very expensive mistake.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			That is true unless they say that ebay rules make them list it as a reprint, because it is not graded.  Then it could be real.
		 
				__________________ $co++ Forre$+ | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 
				__________________ Bill Potter T206 Beater Collection currently at 51/524 | 
| 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I'm glad you posted, so guys like me won't make the same mistake (hopefully).
		 | 
| 
			 
			#12  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Honestly 
			
			not really close, many of the T206 reprints look like this card
		 | 
| 
			 
			#13  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Yeah , they are all the same. It was a lot easier to tell once cards were in hand. If I go back and look at them now its obvious but live and learn.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#14  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Lesson learned; not an expensive one. Maybe use them as a reference for future purchases.
		 Last edited by Bpm0014; 11-08-2014 at 03:40 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#15  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			At least $28 is not an expensive lesson.
		 
				__________________ Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. | 
| 
			 
			#16  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Read THIS thread and feel much better about your purchase.
		 
				__________________ Bill Potter T206 Beater Collection currently at 51/524 | 
| 
			 
			#17  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
  Entertaining at least | 
| 
			 
			#18  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			True... its more of not doing my homework than the actual $$$.
		 Last edited by Mountaineer1999; 11-08-2014 at 05:11 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#19  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			This was a help to me. http://www.t206museum.com/page/forgery.html
		 
				__________________ Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Ebay - Another obvious reprint | I Only Smoke 4 the Cards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-19-2014 06:10 PM | 
| Getting sick of the more obvious frauds | calvindog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 205 | 04-15-2013 11:16 AM | 
| This is obvious shilling!!! | Edwolf1963 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-13-2012 01:29 PM | 
| Can it be any more obvious? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-20-2005 11:10 AM | 
| another one for Mr. Obvious | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-13-2003 04:25 PM |