|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Tony
I have a question. I am about to purchase some cards that are Sgc graded, but are in their older holder that show the 1- thru 100 grade only on their label, not their newer ones that now show that, along with the Psa equivalent # next to it as well. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: leon
They will re-evaluate the cards and merit them on their standards today. You can tell them you want a minimum (the current grade) and they will only re-holder those cards that meet, or exceed, the old holder grade. So the short answer is ....they re-evaluate them and there is no guarantee. good luck... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
To be consistent with the policy Leon described shouldn't they be willing to buy back a card THEY graded but they now feel was improperly graded? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: FYS
They will revaluate the card and the do reserve the right to adjust the grade. If the grade goes down, a reimbursement will be given for the drop. The amount is at their descretion. I have read a couple of posts on this board describing the process. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Chris McAlister
I have some sgc graded cards and based on the grading scale and descriptions there is no way they should grade as low as they are. Whats my worst case, I have to pay to have the same grade? (I'm talking about cracking the slabs and resubmitting them) Here is a possible problem, they are the only graded sgc examples, will I get a non-bias grade?, Or should I send them in their slabs and ask for a regrade? I like sgc and most of the time I agree with their grades. Thanks for any reply P.S. They were all graded in succession |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: FYS
It is a risk reward question you must answer yourself: |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: leon
I have never seen them ask to crack an old SGC holder if the grade doesn't look up to snuff of current levels. I know 3 graders, the general partner, the admin person, and the VP of Operations...and have had numerous conversations with all of them. I have never heard of what you are talking about...unless they changed their policy recently. I have only submitted one old SGC holder to a crossover. It crossed over the same grade. This is it....regards |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Chris McAlister
o.k. I will post a picture of one of the cards and give a description and tell me if the you feel the grade is correct. Good focus, no creasing or breaks in print, clean spot free back, edges straight and one corner(lower right) with a slight touch otherwise sharp corners. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: FYS
Regarless of grade, I would get the card reholdered just to have the split grade flip. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: FYS
Leon, |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Josh K.
Im guessing the card above got no better than a 60, but most likely a 50. Two of the corners look a little soft. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Anson
With what I can see, I would give a 60. Of course, it's impossible to really grade the card without having it in hand. I find that many imperfections do not show up on scans or even quick naked-eye glances. Sometimes it takes me a minute or two to spot a small wrinkle. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Chris McAlister
It's a 40 vg. Does anyone think I have a chance of a better grade by sending the cards back in their slabs? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: leon
I stand corrected on that. I guess I never heard them say anything about "downgrading" because it was never brought up in our conversations. The one time I had a card re-evaluated I (now) remember holding my breath when I got it back. Honestly I didn't remember that old thread until I just saw it again. AND it's only a month old....I think I need a break....their policy speaks for itself....regards |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Josh K.
a 40 seems low, but its very easy to miss minor imperfections without looking through a 10x loop. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
RE; Sgc re-slab into new holder from old??
Posted By: Chris McAlister
60 EX 5: 80/20 or better centering, minor rounding or fuzzing of corners, roughness or chipping along edge (no layering), one VERY slight surface or "spider" crease may exist on one side of the card, gloss may be lost from surface with some scratching that does not detract from the aesthetics of the card. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Multi Card Fantasy Slab | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-18-2007 04:49 PM |
New SGC Holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-03-2006 08:51 AM |
New SGC Slab for T3's. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 04-28-2006 12:17 AM |
Question about card positioning within SGC slab. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-16-2006 07:25 PM |
SGC needs to do better on this holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-16-2001 01:56 PM |