Quote:
Originally Posted by rhettyeakley
In the Holsum Bread set the Peckinpaugh card in Type 1 (1920) has him correctly identified as “PeckinPaugh” while the Type 2 (1921) has his name mistakenly listed as “ PeckinBaugh”
The mistaken spelled was continued into the next round of production (which included the E121 Series of 80 cards (Type 1) cards
The last round of production of the cards with their various backs included E121-80 Type 2 & 3 backs, Gasslers’s and Koester’s Bread has the comoany RE-correcting the card to “PeckinPaugh”
What exactly do you think you are proving with that?
|
Rhett,
Please review your previous post, not your response you just made. You stated:
"And, when I say they line up perfectly...I mean there are 0 outliers! There is not a single mistake made in the Herpolsheimer's checklist and includes copies of cards that were not known to exist in the "E121 family of sets" in the 1970's...like the Davenport card (which is only included in the sets listed above and 1-2 copies in the world as a W575-1)"
Well mistake could be interpreted as a mistake in the name or in the nameplate of a player, thus the question involving Peckinpaugh/Peckinbaugh.
Now, as for the link:
https://archive.org/details/LanstonM...e/n23/mode/2up
Just under 20 to 20 years off. Uh, hmmm.
Go to the link and below the images?
A typographical specimen booklet containing borders and ornaments for casting on the Lanston Monotype Composition Caster, Lanston Monotype Type-Caster, Lanston Monotype Giant Caster and Monotype-Thompson Type-Caster. This booklet is from a Lanston Monotype specimen book (binder) bearing the general title "Monotype Type Faces."
It is undated, but based on internal evidence elsewhere in the binder it is from the late 1930s or early 1940s.
11-27-2023, 09:12 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode