|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: should a seller refund a buyer even though there was a tracking number showing scans? | |||
| Yes the seller should refund even though it's usps fault |
|
64 | 64.65% |
| no, the USPS made the mistake and not sellers fault. |
|
35 | 35.35% |
| Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is my take on it. IF the buyer and seller didn't talk about insurance at all then it is on the seller to get the package to the buyer, period. Just as it is on the Buyer to get the money to the seller. It doesn't matter if it's WWIII, the seller has the obligation to get the buyer his card. Now, if the buyer was offered insurance and turned it down then that is another story. I voted no on the refund but am not sure I didn't get it twisted around? So, I actually do think the seller should give a refund if the buyer never got the goods, regardless of who's fault it is, UNLESS the buyer turned down insurance. If nothing was said, each party should be obligated to the other party for their part of the deal.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| paying strong for the following 1952 topps baseball | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2008 11:08 AM |
| Is it really Net54's fault? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-26-2007 11:23 AM |
| Paying big money for the final 10 1911 Zeenuts I need.... | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 11-22-2006 06:45 PM |
| paying stupid prices for common 33 Goudey PSA 7 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2006 05:40 PM |
| It is not my fault | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-21-2005 05:46 AM |