Hello,
For this post, please remember that when I refer to cleaning or soaking it is with 100% distilled water only.
1) I agree. The pinhole is there yet subtle enough where it doesn’t take away from the card. It does go through the back, unfortunately. It’s like looking through a peak / peep hole. Ever watched the 1982 movie, Porky’s? ��.
2a & b) I don’t think anyone with common sense will resubmit this card to a grader w/ a hole in it. It makes zero sense.
Even if you clean the card, it’s still gonna have the hole. It’s not like soaking the card is gonna make the cardboard grow to fill the hole. Additionally, it could be greater as authentic instead of a1 / poor.
Soaking does not always clean a card. it was primarily used 5+ decades ago to remove cards that were taped or glued in scrapbooks. Additionally, some cards cannot be soaked and could be destroyed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred
Wow, I had to go back to post 178 to refresh.
1) I didn't see the pin hole in the card, however, my thought was that the card looks pretty nice beyond the paste at the corners.
2a) If it were cleaned, it could be resubmitted and there's the possibility the TPG misses that "very tiny" pin hole. I wouldn't promote the resubmission in the attempt to get it by the TPG, but I'm sure others might see the potential benefit.
2b) I suppose the next question would bring up debate. If it were soaked and result in no damage to the card, then an assumption is that card would look awesome (front is centered fairly well). Would anybody soak it just to have a nicer looking card (assuming no damage to the card occurs).
3) For arguements sake (or to alleviate most reasons for a debate), lets say the card was soaked only in water.
|
02-03-2024, 02:32 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode