|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should E98 Old Put be classified as caramel or tobacco? | |||
| caramel |
|
30 | 71.43% |
| tobacco |
|
12 | 28.57% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think removing marks of any kind is altering the card. I realized comic collectors and vintage collectors of many things...vintage cars, clothes...whatever do this all the time. A serious coin collector would never alter a coin. A mark on a card may be removeable but I doubt that it could be done without disturbing the paper fibers. Comic books are cleaned and restored all the time...this is wrong to me. I also (IMO) think that autographed or signed cards are ruined I don't care if its babe ruth or joe shmoo. I (if I collected sigs) would prefer them on a baseball or index card or anything but a baseball card. Aloha, Dave. Since when did cleaning and pressing creases out of a comic become ok and cleaning or pressing a card not. Cleaning pressing restoring is a BIG no no for me. Aloha, dave.
Last edited by Cardboard Junkie; 06-03-2012 at 10:36 AM. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| American Caramel E121 series of 80 survey revisited | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 01-11-2012 04:46 PM |
| Caramel cards...whats the deal with all the writing on them?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-07-2007 10:51 PM |
| SOLD 1910 E75 American Caramel - Near Set 16/20 | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 05-29-2007 11:07 PM |
| E96 Philadelphia Caramel Connie Mack "Signed" FT | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 08-31-2006 09:31 AM |