|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Did it have to get reslabbed after?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It has been reglued back to its original form. Scott at SGC said that anyone who buys it can have it reslabbed by him or we may send it to him prior to sale to have it done.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would have it reslabbed Troy. Regluing a holder that has been taken apart doesn't sound like a good plan moving forward. It's worth the extra fifty bucks, or whatever they charge.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kudos to Troy and Saco River for getting two opinions. Folks that are skeptical shouldn't bid. I am sure there won't be a shortage of people wanting this item. Best of luck.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Toby-I think you are right that a lot of people will want the item. However, I'm not sure that there are many people, if any, who will want to pay a significant price. I don't know anyone who will go crazy for this item. Do you?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Jay, hard to predict where this item will go pricewise. A rare item will bring serious interest. I guess we will see once the auction ends. I wouldn't be surprised if the price is strong.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
If I'm ever selling anything that you are skeptical about, please feel free to ask questions. Troy doesn't mind either. The only people that seemed to mind are forum members, which really surprises me - this is a discussion forum and we're talking about a $50,000 collectible.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Say it was fake, how would he have printed the image if he doesn't have the negative. And remember the site white Betsy, they showed some items that a forger would do every little detail.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
The process of taking a photo of the LOC image would create a new (2nd generation) negative, and he would make a print from this negative. This process would cause a degradation in resolution, in much the same way that xeroxing a document would create a copy of lesser resolution.
Last edited by benjulmag; 01-09-2013 at 09:57 AM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's possible that a forger might want to then deliberately reduce resolution enough to obscure any small flaws or characteristics that might be attributable to the LoC item. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The CDV and auction just got a plug on Fox Business News
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those reading all the posts in this thread you know I have been expressing great skepticism as to the authenticity of the Saco River image due to the degradation in resolution compared to the LOC copy. That concern still exists. However, to be entirely fair I feel that should information come to my attention that would argue in favor of the item being authentic, I have a responsibility to present it.
Below is an image of the 1865 Atlantics mammoth plate (photographed from Stephen Wong's book "Smithsonian Baseball"). That photo resides in my collection and is a salt print. It first surfaced in the summer of 1991 when it was sold by the Connecticut auction house Nadeau's. The sister image that accompanied it in the sale was a mammoth plate composite of the 1873 Baltimores (consisting of CdVs of each player with a calligraphed overlay). Both photos were housed in identical period frames and both exhibited considerable aging. I have no doubt as to the authenticity of each image. When I asked the auctioneer where he got them, he responded he recently bought the entire contents of a local estate sale and those two images were part of that estate. The auctioneer claimed they were literally thrown into the deal for little or no consideration. Why is this relevant? Examination of the background of the 1865 mammoth plate shows it to be essentially identical to the background of the Saco River image, and at variance with the background of the LOC image. So it would seem Williamson did use a vignette process to highlight the players. This match between backgrounds I regard as significant, though not dispositve because a forger could have used the mammoth plate to create his background. In addition, the fact remains that the resolution of the Saco River image is below what one would expect from an original CdV and signficantly less than that of the LOC copy made from the same negative. And I remain perplexed how that can be. Taking all this into account in my view increases the possibility the Saco River image is genuine. I still feel further testing is warranted and that without it the leap of faith required to be comfortable it is real is more than I would be comfortable taking. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just read a article about it and someone said it will go six figures.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL, does that count the numbers to the right of the decimal point?
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Link to Fox Sports (AP) write up: http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/1...auction-010913
Sincerely, Clayton Last edited by teetwoohsix; 01-09-2013 at 04:24 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 SGC Graded Brooklyn Team Set 23 out of 27 Cards SOLD SOLD!!! | brookdodger55 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 03-31-2012 06:15 PM |
| Looking for Brooklyn Dodger Collectors | dougscats | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-27-2010 05:19 PM |
| Looking for Brooklyn Dodgers collectors | dougscats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-24-2010 12:16 PM |
| FS: RARE Ca. 1860's CDV Civil War Generals and Officers featuring Abner Doubleday SGC Auth | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-06-2008 07:07 PM |
| Early Baseball CDV | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 07-25-2004 11:24 PM |