Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb
I know, Adam, every time I post something on Net 54 involving a controversial topic, you always take the con side to my point of view. I don't even mean 99% of the time but instead, 100%. At this point, I have to think that it is something personal that you have against me (don't know what or why). It's too bad, I used to have a lot of respect for you, especially your knowledge about baseball exhibit cards of the '20's & '30's.
I know more than a little bit about Negro League Baseball material and would not make a definitive statement if I was unsure about an item.
|
Phil, this is about 'eye', not about expertise in Negro League stuff.
As I already said (and was, of course, ignored), it's real easy to just say right out of the box that this is bad - the odds are about 95% that you would be right, regardless of what the scan looks like. I tried real hard not to take that approach with this item, even offering to look at it in person for the Original poster. I really think that, given these scans, that's the only way to be fair to him.
As I said, I wouldn't bid on it without a return guarantee, but post-wwi black baseball memorabilia is a risky area, and as you know, I have no interest in it.
04-24-2013, 11:22 AM
Similar Threads
Hybrid Mode
