Peter Nash where are the items you stole from me!

[E93]

Why don't you just let the judge know he has not complied and get a bench warrant for his arrest?
JimB

[ALR-bishop]

I wonder if the detective also has Courtesy Cards and what it means if you get one of them

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by E93

Why don't you just let the judge know he has not complied and get a bench warrant for his arrest?
JimB

My guess is Robert doesn't think Angelo still has the item?

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

This is getting to be unhealthy. I understand being upset but posting all of this material is not a good idea.

[timzcardz]

OK, I'll be the one to ask, name and all, why is this on the main page when it apparently has nothing to do with pre-war baseball cards?

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by timzcardz

OK, I'll be the one to ask, name and all, why is this on the main page when it apparently has nothing to do with pre-war baseball cards?

Agreed. It should probably be moved to the Memorabilia section.

[Cardboard Junkie]

Originally Posted by timzcardz

OK, I'll be the one to ask, name and all, why is this on the main page when it apparently has nothing to do with pre-war baseball cards?

ssshhhhhhhhhhhh

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

This is getting to be unhealthy. I understand being upset but posting all of this material is not a good idea.

Why is it not a good idea Alex? It has to do with fraud in our hobby. At least what is being posted is factual documents not hearsay and sources.

If Robert wants to use this public forum as an avenue to try and add more pressure and awareness on the frauds committed by Peter Nash why should that be an issue? The thread title is pretty self-explanatory and you’ve visited the thread so you know roughly what it’s about. So ignore the thread if you think it’s unhealthy.

[Cardboard Junkie]

This:

[Section103]

Dumb question, but does the Peter Nash post on this board? Im assuming the Prime Minister does not.

[Big Dave]

Not under his own name.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Why is it not a good idea Alex? It has to do with fraud in our hobby. At least what is being posted is factual documents not hearsay and sources.



If Robert wants to use this public forum as an avenue to try and add more pressure and awareness on the frauds committed by Peter Nash why should that be an issue? The thread title is pretty self-explanatory and you’ve visited the thread so you know roughly what it’s about. So ignore the thread if you think it’s unhealthy.

John - I think having am entire thread devoted to a personal matter is not appropriate. It also seems border line harassment to me. Let me be clear that I am not picking sides as I don't know either person and was not around when any of this happened.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Fuddjcal]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

John - I think having am entire thread devoted to a personal matter is not appropriate. It also seems border line harassment to me. Let me be clear that I am not picking sides as I don't know either person and was not around when any of this happened.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think that fraud like this that has been perpetrated on this level against anyone is PERFECTLY APPROPRIATE.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by I Only Smoke 4 the Cards

John - I think having am entire thread devoted to a personal matter is not appropriate. It also seems border line harassment to me. Let me be clear that I am not picking sides as I don't know either person and was not around when any of this happened.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Alex, fair enough. I will say that I find your reasons a bit hard to follow. Just the sentence above....you have no knowledge of the people or the circumstances yet you draw the conclusion its harassment and not appropriate?

Second having a thread all to ones self for personal reasons is pretty much this entire site. How many threads are about such things as.....

I bought this so is it real?
Can somebody put me in touch with someone else?
Please look at my progress on this set thus far....
Has anyone bought from this seller? I want to buy from him....
Please guess my grades, I think I was robbed.
Does my card looked trimmed?

There are plenty of threads that are started for self serving reasons I don't see this as any different. Perhaps less innocent but at the same time more impactful to many as this is about fraud which effects us all vs. the PSA 3 someone got vs the EX they were expecting so rally to my aid thread.

Just my two cents and the great part about a single thread is I can always ignore it. Now if Robert starts posting in every thread the same stuff no matter the topic I would agree.

Cheers,

John

[Peter_Spaeth]

Then there are the threads of general interest. SGC v PSA v101.2. Fake Honus Wagner on ebay.

[npa589]

Read back a couple pages, and realized there was no need for my post regarding some people questioning the placement this thread. IMO, I think it's perfectly relevant to our hobby, and can serve a positive purpose. Go team.

[slidekellyslide]

As long as Peter Nash is slinging mud on his blog I have no problem with Robert using a thread or two to strike back. Nash is a hypocrite, and the more he is exposed the safer the hobby is from him. Anyone having a problem with this thread is free to skip it or put Mr Fraser on your ignore list.

[tschock]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Why is it not a good idea Alex? It has to do with fraud in our hobby. At least what is being posted is factual documents not hearsay and sources.

If Robert wants to use this public forum as an avenue to try and add more pressure and awareness on the frauds committed by Peter Nash why should that be an issue? The thread title is pretty self-explanatory and you’ve visited the thread so you know roughly what it’s about. So ignore the thread if you think it’s unhealthy.

But John, that would mean everyone would have to be responsible for their own actions rather than having other people do it for them.

[Runscott]

I like Robert, Dan and John. All are interesting, intelligent and opinionated (proactive defense)

Robert's the only one who is really seriously affected adversely by any of this - it's just frustrating to not hear any sort of meaningful plan from him, since after all, he is posting all of this stuff on our vintage baseball card discussion forum, not on his own 'Peter Nash is an A-Hole' Forum. Being a member only of the former, and being in that venue at this exact moment, I feel justified in stating that opinion. Hope it's okay.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Runscott

I like Robert, Dan and John. All are interesting, intelligent and opinionated (proactive defense)

Robert's the only one who is really seriously affected adversely by any of this - it's just frustrating to not hear any sort of meaningful plan from him, since after all, he is posting all of this stuff on our vintage baseball card discussion forum, not on his own 'Peter Nash is an A-Hole' Forum. Being a member only of the former, and being in that venue at this exact moment, I feel justified in stating that opinion. Hope it's okay.

There may not be a hell of a lot he can do. It seems in terms of Nash's own assets he appears to be behind REA and perhaps other creditors. It seems Nash no longer is in possession of the specific items he has been ordered to return to Robert. So maybe Robert is hoping these posts bring out information someone may have about the whereabouts of the items.

[I Only Smoke 4 the Cards]

Originally Posted by tschock

But John, that would mean everyone would have to be responsible for their own actions rather than having other people do it for them.

Hahaha .... oh wait you were being serious?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Robert, why is Nash the plaintiff in the suit against REA?

[Fuddjcal]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Why is it not a good idea Alex? It has to do with fraud in our hobby. At least what is being posted is factual documents not hearsay and sources.

If Robert wants to use this public forum as an avenue to try and add more pressure and awareness on the frauds committed by Peter Nash why should that be an issue? The thread title is pretty self-explanatory and you’ve visited the thread so you know roughly what it’s about. So ignore the thread if you think it’s unhealthy.

plus 1

[jhs5120]

Originally Posted by E93

Why don't you just let the judge know he has not complied and get a bench warrant for his arrest?
JimB

+1

I have been wondering the same thing..

[Sunny]

Originally Posted by E93

Why don't you just let the judge know he has not complied and get a bench warrant for his arrest?
JimB

That has already been tried and done, to no avail, see below, warrant for Peter Nash's arrest. Also please read the 3 page letter Robert Edward Auctions attorney wrote a few days before the Judge signed the warrant for Peter Nash's arrest. You will see that Mr. Nash did not cooperate with the Court's Orders so the Judge issued a warrant for Peter Nash's arrest. Still to this day Nash has not cooperated in turning over his assets.

I need to spend my legal fees wisely. I'm going after wage garnishment and any assets the Nash's can't hide such as the website, Hauls of Shame. As for Mr. Angelo he's a licensed CPA, he can't hide, with deep pockets and if he continues to refuse to turn over information on the stolen memorabilia my wife and I will file a complaint with the Westwood police.

http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif
http://www.net54baseball.com/images/attach/jpg.gif