Altered high grade E93s in Mile High?

glchen · #1 07-06-2015, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x2drich2000

Out of curiosity, what is up with the randomly skipped Certs? Cards that got rejected for some reason?

DJ

The randomly skipped cert #'s would either be cards that were rejected for some reason or cards that were graded, but later cracked out and the cert's sent back to PSA (e.g. to try for re-submission).

Peter_Spaeth · #2 07-06-2015, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glchen

The randomly skipped cert #'s would either be cards that were rejected for some reason or cards that were graded, but later cracked out and the cert's sent back to PSA (e.g. to try for re-submission).

Why would someone trying to get a better grade send in the old cert.? In that case why not just submit for a bump?

swarmee · #3 07-06-2015, 09:49 PM

Either reason: sending to SGC and want an "unbiased" grade, or sending back to PSA but would rather crack out and try again then send back in for review.

Peter_Spaeth · #4 07-06-2015, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swarmee

Either reason: sending to SGC and want an "unbiased" grade, or sending back to PSA but would rather crack out and try again then send back in for review.

So why return the certs, especially in the second case where it just telegraphs that the card already has been graded whatever it was graded?

4815162342 · #5 07-06-2015, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

So why return the certs, especially in the second case where it just telegraphs that the card already has been graded whatever it was graded?

To keep the population low. They could wait until after the cards are re-graded to return the certs.

ergoism · #6 07-06-2015, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

So why return the certs, especially in the second case where it just telegraphs that the card already has been graded whatever it was graded?

I think that a lot of people view it as proper etiquette to return the certs so that the population report remains closer to accurate. And for lower pop cards, as was stated above, it's important to not add unnecessary tallies to the pop report.

Edited to add: I don't think anyone is sending in the flip with the card to get regraded. You can send the flips back at any time and they'll know to adjust the pop report accordingly.

sporteq · #7 07-07-2015, 12:36 AM

When were the lower grades offered and what was the final hammer price on them? if anyone has that info, thanks.

autograf · #8 07-07-2015, 07:59 AM

I can't see the 'send in the flips' crowd out there. Explain how if this Cobb gets a 9 why anyone would want to send in a flip that was a 6 or an 8. I understand the 'keep the Pop report right' scenario, but isn't it to the high grade crowd's favor to have MORE lower graded cards in the Pop report--right or wrong--than to be sure it's 'right'. The more cards at a lower level, the more impact that saying '1 of 1' or '1 of 2' really gets. I can't believe many people send in flips after cracking and resubmitting.....

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FS 51 Cards 1970 Topps All High Numbers High Grade!	Northviewcats	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	12-12-2014 02:53 PM
1956 Mickey Mantle PSA 7 Rare HIGH END HIGH Grade	CollectiblesNJ	1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T	49	07-18-2013 02:31 PM
For Trade My High Grade T206s for Your High Grade Cobb Portraits	RGold	Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T	3	11-28-2012 07:37 PM
Mile High- T 209 Set	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	14	10-02-2008 02:13 PM
High-grade E93s Wanted	Archive	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	0	01-20-2006 09:22 AM