 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-01-2015, 02:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
60 Lynch
Similar to your Lepcio, white line between tan and green
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-01-2015 at 06:33 PM. 
|
|
#2
09-01-2015, 05:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice Al, now I have another print variation to find.
|
|
#3
09-04-2015, 11:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
1954 Bowman Preacher Roe
So I was browsing COMC and submitted an error that a 1954 Preacher Roe card had an ink mark at the top and shouldn't be in the raw bucket, and they actually noted it as a print variation. Searched for it in this forum, but didn't get a hit so I figured it might be new to you guys.
.jpg?id=8c5942e0-2d89-4a59-9ab6-5f300de2eba0&size=original) 1954 Bowman #218.2 - Preacher Roe (Ink Loop in Sky) Courtesy of COMC.com Regular one:  1954 Bowman #218 - Preacher Roe [GOOD] Courtesy of COMC.com They have three of them on site (two of Dean's), so that's how they were able to assign it a print variation. Doesn't look like PSA notes it, since there are only 5 graded of any 1954 Bowman Preacher Roe.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 09-04-2015 at 11:13 AM.
|
|
#4
09-04-2015, 05:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
54 Bowman loop variations
The Roe variation, and the similar Erskine variation in the same set, are listed in the SCD Standard Catalog and discussed by Bob Lemke on his Blog. They seem to involve errant autos from cards above on the sheets they were on
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-04-2015 at 05:04 PM.
|
|
#5
09-05-2015, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gibson Scribble
Green print is over the black mark scribble which is dull. I'm glad I saved it
|
|
#6
09-05-2015, 05:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Normal back
|
|
#7
09-05-2015, 06:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are you certain the black is legitimately under the green text?? With the relative 'slickness' of the green ink as compared to the super absorbency of the dull, non-coated cardboard, it seems likely the card was written on by a kid with a magic marker and it isn't some bizarre printing variation. That would account for the black marker being murky on top of the green words. Occam's razor and all that. Plus, there was no black ink (black plate) involved in the printing of 1975 Topps backs.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land  https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. 
|
|
#8
09-05-2015, 06:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
