|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob, I'm not sure he's buying for investment purposes, but I think it needs to be taken into account as part of the decision process.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree 100% and wholeheartedly. but i think we all have certain cards in our collection that we paid well over the norm because of certain sentimental reasons behind that particular card/year/player and the avg price/investment side wasn't really of concern. i also think there's been a little more focus by collectors on the actual card these days vs the actual flip. which is a good thing, imo. we are seeing nice 52 4's selling for $35K+ and crap 5s still not breaking $30K, however a few years ago it'd almost be taboo to pay more for any 4 than what a 5 had previously sold for. Last edited by begsu1013; 12-12-2015 at 12:39 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I feel that when it comes to iconic key cards especially, it's almost as if the population of all examples can be parsed into two discrete pools: the really nice ones for any grade and the "average" ones. The cards that fit in the former category are in effect rare, in terms of how nice they look, the eye appeal they provide their owners, and these cards have their own unique behavior, selling for large premiums. As Bob said, a dead centered 3 will sell in a blink for 24k with people clamoring for it. A "meh" 3 won't move at 17k. Same goes proportionately across all grades. This is personally always how I have shopped. When it comes to the 1952 Topps Mantle, how many of the existing graded population are actually really great looking-- in terms of not tilted, or nicely centered, or no blemishes in the blue background? 1 in 10? 1 in 20? Fewer than that? (Even some of the very high graded examples have tilt and their centering is right on the edge for the technical grade assigned.) Then let's compare the amount of really nice ones to the demand for such examples... For those seeking a lower graded #311, say in the technical grade and thus price range of 4 and below-- how many of the #311s in grades 1 to 4 do we really think are those "special" or freakishly "high-end" cards like that famous 3 that sold a little ways back? Probably only a handful of gorgeous examples in that grade range, which makes those cards very unique, to me. I'd expect the competition for a gorgeous 1 or 2 at auction to be outrageously fierce. Last edited by MattyC; 12-12-2015 at 01:50 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Topps Mantle | ezez420 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 07-18-2014 02:20 PM |
| F/S 1952 Topps to 1966 Topps - Low to mid grade vintage stars - Mantle Maris Mays | frankhardy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 11 | 07-27-2013 10:51 AM |
| Mantle owned SGC 80 1952 Topps Mantle card | Doug | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 01-06-2012 01:29 PM |
| FS: 1969 Topps Mantle, 1952 Topps Pafko, 1974 Topps Aaron | jb217676 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-05-2010 02:28 PM |
| 1952 Topps Mantle | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-23-2006 11:04 AM |