|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I see a lot of T206 Polar Bears with tobacco staining. Is this a common trait or just a coincidence? Were they packed differently than other issues? Also, why are American Beauty borders so thin?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The others were in a side pocket of the cigarette pack. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I knew there had to be a reason. Thank you for the explanation, xplainer.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
While we are still in a judgement-free zone, another question:
Why are Exhibits so relatively affordable? I assumed it was a pop issue, but consider this: PSA has graded 158 DiMaggio 39-46 Exhibits and over 1000 39 Play Ball DiMaggios. The SMR of a Play Ball PSA 5 is roughly 5x the price of the Exhibit. And in my opinion, the Exhibit is so much better looking (less toothy.) Any hypotheses are welcome. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Since they are postcards some folks don't consider them to be true baseball cards.
I love them. Some of my most favorite pieces. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ditto for Leaf and Goudey Premiums. The Rith Goudey premium is rare and stunning, and you can buy a decent one for under $1000.
Last edited by Snapolit1; 06-30-2016 at 09:32 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
What do you type in the search box to keep any T206s from coming up on ebay? I'm done with the set (minus the Big 4) and I'd like to not have to scroll through a zillion t206s constantly.
How do you keep a card seller who puts his entire inventory on ebay, every week, every year, with prices so high that no one buys them, from showing up in your search? What do you type in? Thanks, I know this was covered in the past but I missed it. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Brian, that is a great answer. At least I know they aren't really proofs, just called that. I can live with that.
__________________
Ed Collecting PCL, Southern Association, and type cards. http://hangingjudgesports.com |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great thread. Ok, I think I have figured out all the BST abbreviations correctly identified.
FS - for sale WTB - wanted to buy WTTF - wanted to trade for FT - for trade Are there others that I am missing? |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
LF = looking for
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
WTF? = What The Fadoodle?
Brian |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
OBC (oldbaseball.com) member since 1996... looking for a low-budget T205 Irvin Wilhelm w/ "suffered" Scans of my Brooklyn Dodger collection |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
tbob |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
common to the issue, yes, the slide and shell was thinner........
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Aside from the "throwing" and "Portrait" T206 cards, are there any other old Rube Waddell cards out there? I can't seem to find even a picture of one.
__________________
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away."- Tom Waits |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
AB borders are thinner than other T206 because the cigarette packs that they came in were more narrow than the other packs.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
what is a pre rookie card and who decides it?
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Makes me wonder if T206 PSA 8s also came in smaller packs.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ghlight=beauty Brian |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Box was narrower
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
The questions posed have been for the most part appropriate and many answers have been given. So why in the hell after twelve hours has my initial question been ignored. Perhaps it wasn't so stupid after all. Maybe starting out with the triple folder question was a bit presumptuous on my part, so i will ask another related question. Were T201 Double Folders folded into packs at the time of distribution or were the cigarettes just longer? and Are all high grade T201 cards creased as a result of their packaging?
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Brian |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
since they were indeed folded in the packs, and it was a machine fold, I don't believe they are technically considered creases. What does often happen is that the hinge (what the intelligentsia call the crease) wears on the edges of the cards the more it is used and you get a notching effect on the borders. In my experience this is what can really damage the grade of an otherwise appealing T201 or T202.
Last edited by Aquarian Sports Cards; 06-30-2016 at 10:24 PM. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Frank, I can't answer your question, but...
Why are T202 Hassan named Triple Folders when they only have 2 folds? Why are they not called Hassan Triptychs? Why do I occasionally see them with a center crease? Why do people cut them in thirds and sell the pieces on ebay?(Hi Brian )
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are strip cards naked?
Last edited by pariah1107; 06-30-2016 at 11:16 PM. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Mecca cigarettes were about as long as camel unfiltered. Do they still sell unfiltered cigarettes in the U. S.? But I digress... The cards came folded and that fold can greatly affect the quality of the card. Think chipping and wear on a typical card. I asked about this a few years back in a discussion with Earl, formerly the Customer Service guru at SGC (hey, Earl, what is up). His comments are what you would expect for a standard card with the caveat to pay attention to the condition of the fold. As for the fold, it is quite evident on higher graded T 201's, but much cleaner, obviously created by machine in the print and coalation process, with a smoother surface. And yes, the condition of the back of the card, especially the fold, will have an impact on grading. I have a question about T201. The cards were printed at two locations, factory 30 and 649. Which location represents a scarcer card, and why doesn't anyone collect by factory location on these cards like we see on T205, T206, T207?
__________________
T206 156/518 second time around R312 49/50 1959 Topps 568/572 1958, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1957, 1956… ...whatever I want Last edited by drmondobueno; 07-01-2016 at 11:13 AM. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Frank!
outlier: someone who is different or far from a main or related body. Larry
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Have a great holiday weekend. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Okay sorry if this crosses the streams on pre/post war...
If as in my estimates T206 was darn close to one of the highest produced sets in card history, but because of barkeeps just sweeping hundreds of them into the trash each night made scarcer by survival in theory. In 100 years does someone see junk wax held in the same regard because it is basically dumped by the ton daily? Really...who is holding junk commons? I won't be alive to see the day, but it is something I have thought of. My 2nd question is sadly grading based, which always brings out the TPG hating. Sorry... Why does PSA sometimes number grade hand cut cards, but not always? I have strip and sheet cut cards with PSA numbers. The growling on BVG is that they will grade sheet cuts and the PSA guys say that with disdain, which is silly because PSA has certainly graded sheet cuts. What is the reasoning on the 50/50 standard on hand cuts with all of the TPGs honestly? It seems all of them either give a grade or an "auth", with no rhyme or reason.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 07-02-2016 at 08:39 AM. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Always looking for rare Tommy Bridges items. |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Even the junk stuff that was fringe sets like Signature rookies or Front Row probably produced more for one set than were made for the tougher backs. SR was usually around 45000 base sets, 1% survival would be 450 cards! I used to save junk wax commons, then had kids and needed the space more. There is some "junk" that's not as common as everyone thinks it is. Steve B |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have a partial set. All PSA. I gotta say this is the most inconsistently graded cards (set) I have encountered. The PSA 7 and 4.5 look very similar. It's all in the details of the crease I'm told. But when you look at a stack and try to blindly order them by grade, you'll see you are waaaaay off from what PSA says. Not in any particular direction either. Could be just me, but I've heard others say similar things. Last edited by BBB; 07-01-2016 at 07:16 PM. |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
T206 156/518 second time around R312 49/50 1959 Topps 568/572 1958, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1957, 1956… ...whatever I want |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't know if any are tougher from one location or another. But I think that might be the case as the plants served different distribution areas. So the player mix may have varied. I collect most things to include factory differences. I just haven't done a whole lot with T201s yet. Steve B |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| probably a stupid question regarding psa/dna | milkit1 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 5 | 07-21-2013 06:13 PM |
| Stupid question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-05-2007 01:57 PM |
| stupid question #44 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-07-2006 05:52 AM |
| I don't usually post stupid auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2006 02:07 PM |
| Using my stupid post allowance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-25-2002 05:51 PM |