|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
What are you proposing Orlando? A grading scale based entirely on subjective eye appeal? If not, then any scale with "objective" standards is necessarily going to have some outliers where the card looks better than the technical grade, but so what?
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-30-2017 at 06:30 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
No peter, that would be madness, and inevitably lead to anarchy. I am proposing that we use the grades as guidelines, but not get so hung up on them when applying value. And I propose that a crease on the face be treated more harshly than an innocuous invisible crease. Same with paper loss.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-30-2017 at 06:36 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Or it is maybe THE PREMISE OF THIS ENTIRE THREAD.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think so. Nobody said only the grade matters. But it matters some. It would be as foolish to think the grade is irrelevant, as to think it's the sole determinant. It's some combination of both in most cases except where it's a truly commodity card in which case the flip rules.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-30-2017 at 06:52 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your comments and I don't want to get in the middle of an argument here, but my feeling is grading is subjective and that there really aren't that many objective standards in the grading process. That's why I hate the numeric grades cards receive because it's pretending that there really is an objective and precise standard. That's why the same card can be resubmitted several times and get a different grade each time. I think eye appeal is very important and should be part of the grading process. If a card is ugly for the grade, good chance it's overgraded. If it's "the best 3 I've ever seen", maybe it is in fact better than a 3. I'm just not a big fan of third party grading in its current form, and think it could be done a whole lot better. Not saying I have the answer to how it should be done, I'm just not a fan. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
What does it take to become a grader at either SGC or PSA? I think I've read on a previous thread that PSA graders are allowed like 15 seconds to look at a card, to determine the grade. Maybe that applies in what kind of service the customer paid for or value of the card?
Grading changed the hobby, which has allowed for subjective opinions to be traded like commodities. I would have loved to see a grading company back in the early 2000s, just grade the card saying it's either fake, altered, or genuine and un tampered with. In other words KIS (Keep It Simple).
__________________
Love Ty Cobb rare items and baseball currency from the 19th Century. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think SOME people do, cuz we've seen examples of the SAME card magically reholdered in a slab with a higher grade and it sells at an AH for many multiples of the original sale price. The registry sometimes drives blind love for the grade on the flip regardless of what is inside the plastic.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
The market recognized that not all 3's are the same. The market took into account all facets of the card - the great centering, color, focus...and a minor technical flaw that makes the flip read "3". All things considered, the market priced the card high and possibly very correct when compared to an average "3".
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
. My initial post was to Barry but you decided to reply to me and in so doing completely twist my post due to some hang up of yours. Nice job! I get that you dig centered 1s with great eye appeal. Unlike all of your self-serving posts, none of mine were stating what my opinion or beliefs are about the eye appeal of cards or their value in the hobby. I am typing this slowly hoping that it sinks in. Must have been a rough week for you in court.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 479 Fresh to the Market Charles Conlon Photos (with TY COBB SLIDING) | prewarsports | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-05-2015 01:26 AM |
| Is the baseball card market a "perfect" market? The Demise of the "price guide" | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-29-2013 10:09 PM |
| Fresh to market PSA T206 Lajoie 4 Cobb Red 2~Perfectly Centered~Matty 1 +1930s Under 3 hrs | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 04-01-2008 05:47 PM |
| Cornering the market on one card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 69 | 03-13-2008 08:29 AM |
| Housing / Stock Market Affecting Card Market ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-09-2007 11:37 AM |