![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm a purist when it comes to my personal collection. I want my cards to be authentic and unaltered. That being said, it's a free country and others can collect/spend their money however they want. the only things that have been worked more than this card are the Kardashian's and I-95. Do they draw the line at the name on the bottom border? If the bottom border was also gone, it is obviously a Wagner. What about a Doyle or Magie? Do I just send in a borderless one, pay the 14k or whatever and request the card I want? I'm certainly no whale in this hobby but I collect certain items because I enjoy them. Some a few dollars, some are many thousands. I was never looking to flip my cards or make money. I collect what I like and figured if I had to sell years later I could at least break even. I can only imagine the work being done to transform 7's into 8's and 8's into 9's and so on. Between this and the other thread about the fake signed T206's, I'm losing interest in this hobby.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
I can't agree more.....I'm just like you..... if we accept this as collectors, its hard to draw the line..... almost like "manufacturing rarity".........if you want that, buy new cards ![]() vintage cards should not be tampered with by altering, once that is done, the card has no more integrity than the seller ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the flip should read
"FRANKEN - WAGNER" ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wouldn't buy one personally but as everything they did in the restoration is documented and there was no attempt to deceive collectors I have no problem with this.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How this hasn't yet led to a spin-off "I like my Wagners like my women" thread is quite beyond me.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Authentic and a little rough around the edges?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That's an excellent question! Magies can probably be identified by particular flaws on the front/back. I haven't done much with the scans I've saved off lately, but there were specific things that I was seeing only on Magies So that's a bigger question. How far to go in restoring? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a t206 collector myself I actually prefer when cards do not look "pristine" I love the way that wagner looked originally, Would never buy that after it was restored.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Didn't we see one of the Just So's done that way and it came out pretty good!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() The Just So, as I recall, retained the original player image and inserted new borders cannibalized from another (actress subject) Just So. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Any opinions on this now that it sold for 420k? 2 years ago REA sold a SGC 10 for 444k and now a restored one brings almost the same price.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Many collectors used to have the opinion that it’s better to have a hole in a card than a hole in your collection. Personally I never accepted this doctrine as I sought creasefree presentable cards irrespective of the actual numerical grade. As time went on myself and others realized that some cards are in such short supply that you just need to take whatever is available if you eally wanted that card. Similarly are used to hate altered cards even if they presented well where as now I think a lot of collectors are more inclined to pick up these beautifully presenting cards even though they have been slightly altered as opposed to ugly examples in lower grade. Last edited by ullmandds; 12-16-2018 at 08:10 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Slightly altered would be soaked, pressed corner or crease, trimmed edge, etc. This card went through major restoration. It is understandable demand of low pop cards in low grade or even altered cards that look nice. However, this card had 3 borders cut off. By restoring it does that make it worth more? Or is this the bottom on price now and altered or low grade worth more than before?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB Low Grade Honus Wagner - "E" or "M" Cards or MAYBE Colgan's Chips | KMayUSA6060 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 02-25-2018 04:22 PM |
1969-topps complete set, high grade,,"""SOLD"""" | mightyq | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-10-2014 01:28 PM |
This "Feel-Good" Babe Ruth Signed Ball Story is not going to end well. | sports-rings | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 05-02-2013 08:16 AM |
"Honus Wagner" sale on eBay; "like as if it was just taken out of shrink wrap." | Theoldprofessor | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-18-2010 12:44 PM |
Lets do a "feel good" thing for a fellow collector | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-25-2005 12:19 AM |