|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
At least they have the BCCG 7: Very Good or Better or whatever in large print on their label. As long as they realize the card would likely grade a 3 at other companies, what they're doing isn't dishonest. Annoying, but not deceptive.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the fantastic replies to this grading company and system. The collectors are not fond of their grading system it's apparent.
Are the holders easy to break cards out or should you let the professionals do that and ifso fatso, just expect a 5 or 6 SGC/PSA for a BGGS 9? If I were to undertake such a project? I seem to remember stabbing and creasing a perfectly good Rose rookie card in the early eighties in just a regular holder for that time period. Just crumbled the card in the trash at the time. So, I'm not too clear behind the wheel with a knife/screw driver /plastic etc... Thanks again |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have cracked probably 20 BGS/SCD holders that are tougher and 10 SGC holders that are really easy. Haven't done a BCCG one, but they're probably easier than BGS standard holders. SGC you can pry open with a butter knife along the edge. For BGS/SCD, I use pliers to snap off a corner by torquing it, then pry open with a flathead screwdriver. Only slightly bent one card out of the 30 or so I've cracked.
PSA will do it just fine if you submit as a crossover and set whatever minimum grade you'd require. As to grade you should expect, you should know how the grades look and compare to the current listed standards on the PSA website. A BCCG 9 could theoretically grade anywhere between a 6 to even a 9, possibly. Not sure how they grade for centering on BCCG, but BGS centering subgrades are tougher than the PSA grade requires. So you can take BGS 9s if you know what to look for and they'll normally cross to PSA 10 as long as the corners are sharp.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It’s not like pretending a reprint is an original card, but it’s confusing for a newbie. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
BCCG was a concoction for the shop at home shows.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
And I would only use a BCCG holder as a third party opinion that the card is authentic and gradable, nothing more.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-54) 1954 Bowman (-2) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just wondering about others experience, Can we assume that a BCCG 9 would at least grade out a a PSA 7? I have occasionally seen a few vintage graded BCCG 9 that I considered purchasing but never took the chance.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think my dealer friend Tony put it best in this article. "well, I don't know why" with reference to BCCG.
Keep in mind this is from 2005. http://www.monstercards.net/columns/psa060205.html |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yep...
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"In an effort to reach our wider audience, BCCG was created as a high-volume grading service intended to provide collectors with an attractive and affordable alternative to other graded card products. Simplified 10-point grading scale No internal sleeve Quality archival protection Sonically sealed/tamper-proof protection" In this old post, you can actually see how their numbers compare to the norm. In my opinion, this is a 100% deceptive. What is the purpose of this other than to deceive? "BCCG has a completely different grading scale from any of the other grading companies including Beckett. The BCCG grading scale is: BCCG 10 Mint or Better = BGS 9 or Better BCCG 9 Near Mint or Better = BGS 7 or Better BCCG 8 Excellent or Better = BGS 5 or Better BCCG 7 Very Good or Better = BGS 3 or Better BCCG 6 Good or Better = BGS 2 or Better BCCG 5 Poor or Better = BGS 1 or Better" In this older post, it sounds like you also thought the same once upon a time? http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=220046 Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEgaZGrf2gg
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 Last edited by irv; 12-19-2018 at 09:34 AM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bccg vs raw | cardsnstuff | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 07-17-2017 07:39 PM |
| Bccg | Manny Trillo | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 12 | 11-03-2016 05:00 AM |
| Bccg | bigfish | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 07-29-2010 02:39 PM |
| Bccg | hunterdutchess | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 05-26-2010 07:51 PM |
| BCCG........... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-05-2003 10:23 PM |