|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are 3506 views of this thread, and I think maybe 1 person saying he's the best overall pitcher ever. A more interesting question is his place in baseball history, i.e. what value do relievers have in MLB.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mo was such a classy guy and the greatest closer ever but the fact that he was a failed starter, no way can I put him Top 10.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Failed starter...who turned into the greatest reliever of all time. I find it hard to believe that when evaluating him, many experts on the game are going to give a ton of consideration to the fact that he was ever a starter. To say that things turned out "all right" for Mo is quite an understatment.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I always think about how dominant John Smoltz was as a reliever in the early 2000s and thinking, why did Atlanta move him back to the starting rotation. But he was amazing there too. The best starters are often pitching at 85-90% at the beginning of a game and then they bring it up a notch when the going gets tough and then they start registering some ridiculous numbers on the radar gun, despite being fatigued. The reliever has to be 95-100% the entire time they are out there. It's impossible to adequately compare the two. I'm in agreement with most. Greatest reliever of all time and probably top 20 pitcher of all time. His post-season stats are lights out and can't be ignored in the context of evaluating his entire career.
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nothing bothers me more than this "failed" perspective. It's such BS and not even worth talking about. Lefty O'Doul hit 398 in 1929 as an outfielder after he "failed" as a pitcher. Does that discount hitting 398?
Give me a break. Last edited by packs; 01-25-2019 at 10:20 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would agree with you the numbers are not there to say anything about him as a starter. But that said, how do you explain his extremely low inherited runners number, why didn't the Yankees use him more in late inning crisis situations instead of almost exclusively as a guy to hold a lead in the 9th?
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
No, he would be the best bunter and maybe not even that, and he would have been a "failed" pitcher on top of that. Last edited by MichelaiTorres83; 01-25-2019 at 12:30 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mariano Rivera | MrSeven | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 8 | 03-02-2019 08:59 AM |
| Does anyone have a Mariano RC , or AROD sp rookie ? LTB | soxfan1986 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 7 | 01-17-2016 04:55 PM |
| My 1992 Mariano Rivera From PSA | herbc | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 4 | 06-12-2015 08:05 PM |
| Looking for Signed Jeter and Mariano!! | Nappy1525 | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 11-10-2014 06:35 PM |
| f/s: '92 bowman mariano rivera...$47 | chaddurbin | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-19-2013 03:35 PM |