NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Buy/Sell/Trade Section (must login, caveat emptor) > T206 cards B/S/T

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2019, 02:54 PM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
John Collins
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaHaveRockandRoll View Post
PSA 2 is worth more like 850k+ now.
It's back to being a PSA 2 now? I thought it was a 4.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:00 PM
GottaHaveRockandRoll's Avatar
GottaHaveRockandRoll GottaHaveRockandRoll is offline
Dylan
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: New York
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jchcollins View Post
It's back to being a PSA 2 now? I thought it was a 4.
The card is not for sale I apologize

Last edited by GottaHaveRockandRoll; 02-20-2019 at 02:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:07 PM
ClementeFanOh ClementeFanOh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,267
Default

The ONLY way that card gets a 3 or 3.5 is if Mr. Magoo is the grader- careful, your credibility is in question....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:20 PM
Luke's Avatar
Luke Luke is offline
Luke Lyon
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,223
Default

Good luck with the sale, but it doesn't help your credibility to tell people that card would grade a 3 or 4. You may just not know that you're wrong, but everyone else on the forum knows you are. If you haven't sent any cards in to PSA in a few years and looked at the grades you received, it's probably best not to make any claims about what grade this card would get.

There's exactly 0.00% chance this card could get a 2.5 or better with those corners, assuming there was no alteration. I would take the the under on 1.75 personally.

It's a great card. No reason to lie or exaggerate to try and make it seem like more than it is.

Edited to add that I probably went a little harder than I needed to in the above post. The OP sent me a PM and said he was just comparing his card to another PSA 2 and his card looked better. That is certainly possible. This card could not get above a "2" because of the corners, but it's still a nice looking card. I have a bunch of PSA 2s with rounded corners that look great.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com

Last edited by Luke; 02-19-2019 at 03:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:52 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke View Post
Good luck with the sale, but it doesn't help your credibility to tell people that card would grade a 3 or 4. You may just not know that you're wrong, but everyone else on the forum knows you are. If you haven't sent any cards in to PSA in a few years and looked at the grades you received, it's probably best not to make any claims about what grade this card would get.

There's exactly 0.00% chance this card could get a 2.5 or better with those corners, assuming there was no alteration. I would take the the under on 1.75 personally.

It's a great card. No reason to lie or exaggerate to try and make it seem like more than it is.

Edited to add that I probably went a little harder than I needed to in the above post. The OP sent me a PM and said he was just comparing his card to another PSA 2 and his card looked better. That is certainly possible. This card could not get above a "2" because of the corners, but it's still a nice looking card. I have a bunch of PSA 2s with rounded corners that look great.
I have seen crazier things than a card that looks like this ending up in a 3 or 4 holder. From the 1 picture I've seen I agree 2 would be the most likely grade, assuming the card had not been altered.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:55 PM
xplainer's Avatar
xplainer xplainer is online now
Jimmy Knowle$
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 View Post
I have seen crazier things than a card that looks like this ending up in a 3 or 4 holder. From the 1 picture I've seen I agree 2 would be the most likely grade, assuming the card had not been altered.
It WAS altered. OP stated so.

Then, unaltered.

So, no, it has not been altered.

It is alterless.
Without alter.
It has no alter.

Last edited by xplainer; 02-19-2019 at 04:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:59 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xplainer View Post
It WAS altered. OP stated so.

Then, unaltered.

So, no, it has now, not been altered.
Right I guess I should have said had it not been altered I would assume a grade of 2. Although given the context of the thread my meaning should have been clear from my previous post.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-19-2019, 04:39 PM
MichelaiTorres83 MichelaiTorres83 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xplainer View Post
It WAS altered. OP stated so.

Then, unaltered.

So, no, it has not been altered.

It is alterless.
Without alter.
It has no alter.
I believe that the past tense of alter means at some point in the past it was changed, regardless of the change but I am an English teacher

Unaltered and unrestored are not words I would use.

It was altered to make it look better then altered again to attempt to make it look like it did before it was altered the first time.

2 times it was altered.

Last edited by MichelaiTorres83; 02-19-2019 at 04:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-19-2019, 06:55 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClementeFanOh View Post
The ONLY way that card gets a 3 or 3.5 is if Mr. Magoo is the grader- careful, your credibility is in question....
Zero is overstating the chance that card, if unaltered, would 3, IMO.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.

My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-19-2019, 07:42 PM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
John Collins
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaHaveRockandRoll View Post
I just said a PSA 2 is worth 850k+ not 600k. The card would be graded a PSA 3 or 3.5 at least

What? I never commented on what you believe the monetary value of any particular grade would be, nor am I contesting that...but ok.

This is all over the place. In the early posts we are told the card sans the altering would be a 2. Then in the middle at some point your tune changed to it being a 4. And just now you are at “3 or 3.5 at least.”???

All very confusing.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-19-2019, 07:48 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jchcollins View Post
What? I never commented on what you believe the monetary value of any particular grade would be, nor am I contesting that...but ok.

This is all over the place. In the early posts we are told the card sans the altering would be a 2. Then in the middle at some point your tune changed to it being a 4. And just now you are at “3 or 3.5 at least.”???

All very confusing.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
As one of my favorite law school profs used to say, it's not confusing, it's CONFUSED.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.

My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-19-2019, 07:50 PM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
John Collins
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
As one of my favorite law school profs used to say, it's not confusing, it's CONFUSED.

That too...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-20-2019, 08:44 AM
dictoresno's Avatar
dictoresno dictoresno is offline
Steve
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: NJ
Posts: 119
Default

just so you know, the OP of this thread raised some eyebrows on blowout forums attempting to sell something shady, and then was PMing people claiming to be a consignor under the same name as their username and soliciting people to sell their cards through him. gotta dig up the thread now.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-20-2019, 09:15 AM
frankbmd's Avatar
frankbmd frankbmd is offline
Fr@nk Burke++
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Between the 1st tee and the 19th hole
Posts: 7,545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
You are or were in sales, right? Did you just blow off people you didn't think were serious buyers or were you respectful to everyone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 View Post
Respectful yes, but if someone making say 40k a year wants to go test drive a $500k Ferrari or Rolls Royce I don't think the response will be sure let me get the keys.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
It's a little easier to post a picture or answer a question than to take someone out for a test drive though.
If the OP came in with the Wagner, which car would he be able to test drive?
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER.

GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES


274/1000 Monster Number

Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? Orioles1954 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 39 08-29-2010 04:30 PM
WTB: T206 Honus Wagner mintacular Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 5 05-04-2010 12:05 PM
T206 Honus Wagner at HOF Steve D Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 04-17-2010 10:00 AM
Honus Wagner T206 Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 11-07-2008 03:32 AM
t206 honus wagner psa 2 Archive Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 22 05-26-2007 05:22 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 PM.


ebay GSB