![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's back to being a PSA 2 now? I thought it was a 4.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The card is not for sale I apologize
Last edited by GottaHaveRockandRoll; 02-20-2019 at 02:04 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ONLY way that card gets a 3 or 3.5 is if Mr. Magoo is the grader- careful, your credibility is in question....
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good luck with the sale, but it doesn't help your credibility to tell people that card would grade a 3 or 4. You may just not know that you're wrong, but everyone else on the forum knows you are. If you haven't sent any cards in to PSA in a few years and looked at the grades you received, it's probably best not to make any claims about what grade this card would get.
There's exactly 0.00% chance this card could get a 2.5 or better with those corners, assuming there was no alteration. I would take the the under on 1.75 personally. It's a great card. No reason to lie or exaggerate to try and make it seem like more than it is. Edited to add that I probably went a little harder than I needed to in the above post. The OP sent me a PM and said he was just comparing his card to another PSA 2 and his card looked better. That is certainly possible. This card could not get above a "2" because of the corners, but it's still a nice looking card. I have a bunch of PSA 2s with rounded corners that look great.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com Last edited by Luke; 02-19-2019 at 03:31 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Then, unaltered. So, no, it has not been altered. It is alterless. Without alter. It has no alter. Last edited by xplainer; 02-19-2019 at 04:01 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Right I guess I should have said had it not been altered I would assume a grade of 2. Although given the context of the thread my meaning should have been clear from my previous post.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Unaltered and unrestored are not words I would use. It was altered to make it look better then altered again to attempt to make it look like it did before it was altered the first time. 2 times it was altered. Last edited by MichelaiTorres83; 02-19-2019 at 04:55 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Zero is overstating the chance that card, if unaltered, would 3, IMO.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
What? I never commented on what you believe the monetary value of any particular grade would be, nor am I contesting that...but ok. This is all over the place. In the early posts we are told the card sans the altering would be a 2. Then in the middle at some point your tune changed to it being a 4. And just now you are at “3 or 3.5 at least.”??? All very confusing. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That too... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
just so you know, the OP of this thread raised some eyebrows on blowout forums attempting to sell something shady, and then was PMing people claiming to be a consignor under the same name as their username and soliciting people to sell their cards through him. gotta dig up the thread now.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 04:30 PM |
WTB: T206 Honus Wagner | mintacular | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 05-04-2010 12:05 PM |
T206 Honus Wagner at HOF | Steve D | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-17-2010 10:00 AM |
Honus Wagner T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-07-2008 03:32 AM |
t206 honus wagner psa 2 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 22 | 05-26-2007 05:22 AM |