|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think the autograph is good. Even IF the card were authentic, it could never be holdered unless the signature was authentic as well.
Card would still have value if it were authentic with a bad signature, but it couldn't be holdered unless both were good. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I do not see anything about the card or sig that would preclude either from being authentic. Whatever happened to “Buy the Card - not the Holder” (or lack thereof).
Maybe the consignor isn’t a collector, and didn’t have the ability to wait a year for the 3rd party “blessing”. He may need his money sooner, and/or couldn’t fathom the obscene premiums people pay for slabs? It’s a shame we’ve reached the point of condemning the card simply for not being slabbed. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Trying to legit a card like this especially with the auto through pictures online is tough, got to be held in hand..
__________________
*********** USAF Veteran 84-94 *********** |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I saw NOTHING that led me to believe that it is NOT a GENUINE '33 Goudey...
Stock is right, felt right, smelled right, printing looked correct, etc. - it passes MY "Stink Test"! I stand behind my assessment above that the autograph is very very close and could certainly be authentic. I’d need to see it in hand however. I know Ruth extremely well and have studied it extensively. This simply looks like he condensed his signature to fit it in the space. This is more than likely authentic. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Maybe it was a windy card and the card kept flapping around while he was trying to sign Sadly, whether he did, or didnt sign, it only matters what a TPGs opinion is, and doubtful this would pass
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Obviously that doesn't mean much but just an observation. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
The buyer at $6500 plus buyer commission either hit a grand slam, if authentic, or struck out 27 straight times if not.
I saw a 1956 Topps set sold for $13,500 plus commission and a 1957 Topps set at $11,000 plus commission. No way to tell from the description and pictures the condition but those are strong bids unless the sets were very nice. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What Are the Chances? | barrysloate | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 12 | 09-23-2012 08:43 AM |
| What are the chances? | tlwise12 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 05-04-2011 01:57 PM |
| What are the chances? | tlwise12 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 03-09-2011 01:23 AM |
| Chances | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 12-13-2008 07:30 PM |
| What Are The Chances This Is Even Possible? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-14-2008 01:46 PM |