Let's talk about "over-looked" true Rookie cards....Pre-war and early Post-war - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2021, 03:54 AM
JLange's Avatar
JLange JLange is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 582
Default First card

I prefer the term “First Card.” To me this says what I need to know - that this is the first known card of a player. You could also add further qualifiers like First MLB Card to distinguish from minor league issues, or First Card with XYZ Team, or First Solo Card to differentiate from multiplayer cards, etc. Everything else that comes after that are not the first card. They may be key or mainstream or more desirable, but they are not the first. Even with my preference for a term like “First Card,” I am not opposed to clarifying or re-defining what is meant by “Rookie Card,” as right now it’s not an overly helpful hobby term.
__________________
Jason
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2021, 06:00 AM
bcbgcbrcb bcbgcbrcb is offline
Phil Garry
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,276
Default

Yes, Bob C., that is correct. Those are some of the easiest cards to classify as rookie cards, no doubters.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2021, 08:07 AM
darwinbulldog's Avatar
darwinbulldog darwinbulldog is offline
Glenn
Glen.n Sch.ey-d
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,521
Default

For those raising the issue of minor league players in major league sets, is there a standard cutoff about what number or % of players in the set (or what number or % of cards in the set) can depict minor leaguers before it's no longer considered a major league set?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-22-2021, 09:07 AM
tedzan tedzan is offline
Ted Zanidakis
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania & Maine
Posts: 10,053
Default Let's talk about "over-looked" true Rookie cards....Pre-war and early Post-war

Hey Guys

A little too much "verbiage" going on here Time for some more card displays. Lefty O'Doul is one of my favorites. Personally, I think he should be in the
Hall of Fame. His rookie year was 1919 with the NY Yankees. I'm not sure which card is his rookie card, he is featured in the 1918 ZEENUT series (but it is
a PCL card). Anyone, on this forum have an idea which card of Lefty (wearing a Major League uniform) is his rookie card ?


.








TED Z

T206 Reference
.

Last edited by tedzan; 06-22-2021 at 01:46 PM. Reason: Corrected typo.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-22-2021, 03:29 PM
Exhibitman's Avatar
Exhibitman Exhibitman is offline
Ad@m W@r$h@w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Posts: 14,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan View Post
Anyone, on this forum have an idea which card of Lefty (wearing a Major League uniform) is his rookie card ?


.










Take your pick...
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true.

https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/

Or not...

Last edited by Exhibitman; 06-22-2021 at 03:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-22-2021, 09:25 AM
bcbgcbrcb bcbgcbrcb is offline
Phil Garry
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,276
Default

Peter:

You are right on the money for all three of those cards.

Again, take a look at the five simple parameters that I use, if a card fits all of those guidelines, then it qualifies as a potential rookie card, if no other qualified rookie cards of that player pre-date it.

Also important to note that all qualified rookie cards from the same year are true rookie cards, whether one was issued earlier or later in the year than another does not make it the only true rookie card. It could be considered the first rookie card produced and may sometimes be accompanied by a premium because of that but not necessarily so.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-22-2021, 09:29 AM
bcbgcbrcb bcbgcbrcb is offline
Phil Garry
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,276
Default

Glenn:

You are correct, sets that consist of predominantly Major League cards but also include some Minor League/Amateur players would qualify for rookie card status. Examples of these would include N172's, '85 Topps McGwire, etc. From around 2000 on, the card companies started defining what constitutes a player's rookie card so once you get modern/ultra-modern cards into the conversation, things change dramatically. That's why my parameters are designed strictly for vintage cards.

Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 06-22-2021 at 09:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-22-2021, 09:33 AM
darwinbulldog's Avatar
darwinbulldog darwinbulldog is offline
Glenn
Glen.n Sch.ey-d
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,521
Default

Is N172 predominantly major leaguers? I'm sure that's a stupid question, but I really don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-22-2021, 09:37 AM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,273
Default

What about a set like Cracker Jacks or some of the Coupon sets that feature a heavy Federal League presence? Are those considered major league cards?

Last edited by packs; 06-22-2021 at 09:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-22-2021, 09:40 AM
Ricky Ricky is offline
Rich
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darwinbulldog View Post
Is N172 predominantly major leaguers? I'm sure that's a stupid question, but I really don't know.
Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-22-2021, 12:59 PM
h2oya311's Avatar
h2oya311 h2oya311 is offline
Derek Granger
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darwinbulldog View Post
Is N172 predominantly major leaguers? I'm sure that's a stupid question, but I really don't know.
There are certainly several "rookie" cards of HOF players that were not yet in the majors.

For instance, Kid Nichols' 1889 Old Judge pictures him with Omaha of the Western Association (minor leagues). Similarly, Clark Griffith's 1889 Old Judge pictures him with Milwaukee of the Western Association.
__________________
...
http://imageevent.com/derekgranger

Working on the following:
HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%)
1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%)
Completed:
1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180)
1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-22-2021, 12:35 PM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,279
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb View Post
Yes, Bob C., that is correct. Those are some of the easiest cards to classify as rookie cards, no doubters.
Thanks. And agree with you.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-22-2021, 12:47 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,501
Default

The Federal League is counted as a major league by MLB, also by Baseball-Reference and basically every other compiler of statistics readily available. I'm not sure that it SHOULD be but it is universally recognized as a major league. Further, I'm not aware of any significant players whose rookie card is a federal league card, or of federal league cards from 1913, so I'm not sure this is relevant anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-22-2021, 12:59 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
The Federal League is counted as a major league by MLB, also by Baseball-Reference and basically every other compiler of statistics readily available. I'm not sure that it SHOULD be but it is universally recognized as a major league. Further, I'm not aware of any significant players whose rookie card is a federal league card, or of federal league cards from 1913, so I'm not sure this is relevant anyways.
It would be everyone's Federal League rookie card.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-22-2021, 01:07 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
It would be everyone's Federal League rookie card.
So Frank Robinson has a National league rookie card and an American League rookie card? I suppose this can be technically so (just as every player has a "rookie card with X team" or any other qualifier one wants to add on), but I don't think this is a definition used by anyone or relevant to the discussion here.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-22-2021, 01:08 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,273
Default

Well, no. The American League and National League are part of the same league. The Federal League, though I guess considered a major league, was still an entirely different league.

Last edited by packs; 06-22-2021 at 01:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-22-2021, 12:52 PM
h2oya311's Avatar
h2oya311 h2oya311 is offline
Derek Granger
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLange View Post
I prefer the term “First Card.” To me this says what I need to know - that this is the first known card of a player. You could also add further qualifiers like First MLB Card to distinguish from minor league issues, or First Card with XYZ Team, or First Solo Card to differentiate from multiplayer cards, etc. Everything else that comes after that are not the first card. They may be key or mainstream or more desirable, but they are not the first. Even with my preference for a term like “First Card,” I am not opposed to clarifying or re-defining what is meant by “Rookie Card,” as right now it’s not an overly helpful hobby term.
I substituted "first" with the word "earliest"...but this is a great post. I have "earliest" photos that pre-date "earliest" cards. There's a lot of grey area out there, so why not allow people to collect what they like!

It's not ready for prime-time yet, but I've been working on a project to share the earliest collectibles/images including a checklist of items for each baseball HOFer. Take a look and let me know what you all think:

https://imageevent.com/derekgranger/hofearliest
__________________
...
http://imageevent.com/derekgranger

Working on the following:
HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%)
1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%)
Completed:
1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180)
1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-22-2021, 04:28 PM
tiger8mush's Avatar
tiger8mush tiger8mush is offline
Rob G.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h2oya311 View Post

It's not ready for prime-time yet, but I've been working on a project to share the earliest collectibles/images including a checklist of items for each baseball HOFer. Take a look and let me know what you all think:

https://imageevent.com/derekgranger/hofearliest
Impressive list, Derek! Majority of those items I didn't know existed.
__________________
Collection on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139478047@N03/albums
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-22-2021, 04:38 PM
Baseball Rarities's Avatar
Baseball Rarities Baseball Rarities is offline
K3v1n Stru55
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h2oya311 View Post
I substituted "first" with the word "earliest"...but this is a great post. I have "earliest" photos that pre-date "earliest" cards. There's a lot of grey area out there, so why not allow people to collect what they like!

It's not ready for prime-time yet, but I've been working on a project to share the earliest collectibles/images including a checklist of items for each baseball HOFer. Take a look and let me know what you all think:

https://imageevent.com/derekgranger/hofearliest
Great website Derek. Thanks so much for putting that together.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-22-2021, 07:09 PM
JLange's Avatar
JLange JLange is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 582
Default

Your site is fantastic! Tremendous research into the earliest cards of these HOFers! Love it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by h2oya311 View Post

It's not ready for prime-time yet, but I've been working on a project to share the earliest collectibles/images including a checklist of items for each baseball HOFer. Take a look and let me know what you all think:

https://imageevent.com/derekgranger/hofearliest
__________________
Jason
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1888 N135 "Talk of the Diamond" Cards Ben Yourg 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T 9 01-23-2019 07:44 PM
1888 N135 "Talk of the Diamond" Cards "graded" Ben Yourg 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T 1 01-16-2018 07:22 AM
1888 N135 "Talk of the Diamond" Cards Ben Yourg 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T 3 01-13-2018 08:13 AM
1931 Blum's Premium " I thought the PSA cover this month looked familiar" bigfanNY Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 01-28-2017 03:29 PM
CLOSED, thanks to those that looked * T205 PSA 4 Otis Crandall "T not crossed" FrankWakefield Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. 4 03-16-2011 11:09 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 AM.


ebay GSB