|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I LOVE the beginning of the description . . .
"Every hobby has its penultimate prize," When my kids were young (20 years ago) when we'd go out for dinner on a Friday night, I would teach the kids a new word. One of those nights, the word was penultimate. Within a couple of weeks, my son's grammar school teacher misused the word and got called out on it! So, was the word misused in the auction description, or are they cleverly pointing out that the restored version is the next to last prize!
__________________
Collector of all things Ripken, Yankees, 1958. Successful transactions with: 300dw123, autograf, bn2cardz, buymycards, CobbvLajoie1910, Daves_resale_shop, frankbmd, GoCubsGo32, GoldenAge50s, GrayGhost, Head928, Jayworld, jdl860, jgmp123, kamikidEFFL, larrie804, Leerob538, lharri3600, Lordstan, megalimey, Orioles1954, quinnsryche, Redleg25, rjackson44, Rob D., SAllen2556, scmavl, slantycouch, slipk1068, Smanzari, TCMA, thetruthisouthere, Wolfgang427, yanks12025, ZackS |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The write-up states "“AUTHENTIC RESTORED,” a designation instituted by PSA for use on higher end vintage treasures."
Have they used this designation before or did they institute it expressly for the Wagner? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
How much of a card has to be left for it to be "authentic"? If I take a T206 Harry Steinfeldt and draw Honus over it so it looks realistic, is that an "authentic" T206 Wagner? Because in my opinion, this treasure is now ruined.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is a Wagner painting now, not a card anymore.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
That T206 Wagner looks to have a bit more than a surface crease (singular) in the “before” picture.
What happened to this PSA 7 1933 Goudey Ruth that is also in the SCP Auction. I am not sure how they can rate this as a “9/10 in the eye appeal department.” https://catalog.scpauctions.com/1933...-LOT48853.aspx Last edited by robertsmithnocure; 10-13-2021 at 04:30 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think they meant the back is 9/10 in the eye appeal.... which I agree. How come this Ruth can zoom in much closer than the Wagner? Are they trying to hide the true current condition of the Wagner? |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
That card looks weird. Like they drew him with too much makeup. The other Wagner is the the one at the Baseball HOF.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 10-13-2021 at 08:41 PM. Reason: makeup instead of 'it' |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
If restoration can preserve and is disclosed then I can accept to some degree. My issue is the artist did a very poor job. The nose, cleft, left eye and right cheek entirely change the appearance. It's very poorly done. Do we know who the artist/restorer was?
__________________
"Chicago Cubs fans are 90% scar tissue". -GFW |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
WTF - that card looks like it had a few too many days out in the sun - how is that a 7!?
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
ugliest wagner i've ever seen. if that's a 2 million card I'll eat a t206!
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed, no way that is a 7 in my mind.
__________________
Successful transactions with: Chesboro41, jimivintage, Bocabirdman, marcdelpercio, Jollyelm, Smanzari, asoriano, pclpads, joem36, nolemmings, t206blogcom, Northviewcats, Xplainer, Kickstand19, GrayGhost, btcarfango, Brian Van Horn, USMC09, G36, scotgreb, tere1071, kurri17, wrm, David James, tjenkins, SteveWhite, OhioCard Collector, sysks22, ejstel. Marty |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
because it's been soaked in bleach, peroxide and trimmed. Color looks like s***. A nice Authentic (Restored), IMHO
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
[QUOTE=timzcardz;2153575]I LOVE the beginning of the description . . .
"Every hobby has its penultimate prize," Hahaha, thank you for pointing that out. They either didn't know the meaning, or it was a Freudian slip. By the way, they have apparently since update the description to remove the "pen" and left the "ultimate" https://catalog.scpauctions.com/1909...-LOT48850.aspx |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Restored T206 Wagner? | Jobu | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 02-10-2020 08:16 AM |
| H. WAGNER, RESTORED or TAMPERED WITH? | pepis | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-21-2013 01:26 AM |
| 1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 08-29-2010 05:30 PM |
| Would the Wagner had sold for more had it not been restored? | martyogelvie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-26-2010 11:10 AM |
| December auctions - T206 Honus Wagner cards PSA 4 and PSA 1 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-17-2004 06:49 PM |