![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A multiple of 12 certainly makes sense for part of T206. But what is the evidence it is 12 and not 24, or some other figure, and that was consistent the entire year and a half of production? We've recently found a sheet from another ATC set of the period that appears to measure over 50 inches across. Perhaps they were only 19 inches wide, but I don't think I've seen evidence that supports this as a conclusion over one possibility of many. Happy to stand corrected.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T206 Molesworth Brown Hindu back | T206DK | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 03-03-2013 01:03 PM |
T-206 G. BROWN WITH HINDU BACK | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 03-14-2009 10:49 AM |
F/S T-206 G. BROWN CHICAGO HINDU BACK | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-13-2009 08:54 PM |
Brown Hindu back on T206s | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-01-2007 10:22 PM |
How much of a value multiplier is a Brown Hindu Back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-06-2002 08:01 PM |